PCCPlan Minutes 2012 10 30: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
* committee agrees to combine this with referral matching, to be approached as one profile | * committee agrees to combine this with referral matching, to be approached as one profile | ||
* | * | ||
==Care Management Revision== | |||
* Coordinate w/HL7 Patient Care | |||
* Need to consider other related profiles (RCG, RCK, etc) | |||
* Perhaps this is a harmonization or white paper effort | |||
* Concerns w/overlap or competition with current US initiatives (S&I Framework) | |||
* | |||
==Diagnostic Study Request== | ==Diagnostic Study Request== | ||
'''Presenter: Vincent van Pelt''' | '''Presenter: Vincent van Pelt''' | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 30 October 2012
Referral Matching
Presenter: George Cole
- 4 Basic Issues (Assumption that we are using XD*):
- 1. Referring system doing the referral knows how to format and where to include a "ReferralId"
- 2. Works for single or multiple submission sets
- 3. Receiving system has to know how to handle, turn around the referral
- using structured or unstructured document, etc
- 4. Referring system needs to know whether or not it will receive a response, and which response it is receiving
- Use XDS Folders, metadata content
- Use certain pieces of CDAR2 and/or CCDA
- Q: Isn't this XDW?
- Could be beneficially used in XDW, but this is not about tracking tasks across enterprise, but instead narrowly focusing down on a referral use case
- Look at Perinatal Workflow and ensure alignment
- Keith:
- Agree that material is there, and this will be helpful to explain how to use it.
- Will be challenges when dealing with unstructured documents
- George: use XD* metadata to help deal with this
- Keith: There is no searching capability within XDS metadata
- Should schedule joint time with ITI during Dec meeting
- John D:
- Is this a Transition of Care XDW component?
- It could become that, a component of XDW
- Is selection of the referral target out of scope, or pre-condition?
- yes, either approach. not trying to profile this.
- Is this a Transition of Care XDW component?
- Wendy S:
- Are we restricting the idea to only using XDS?
- Will use XDS, XDM, XDR - XD*
- Can this be used outside of XD*?
- the piece of this that profiles CDA content could be used outside of XD*
- Are we restricting the idea to only using XDS?
- Keith:
- Is unstructured document going to be used to request a referral?
- we could say unstructured document is off the table...otherwise will be challenges tracking
- Is unstructured document going to be used to request a referral?
- Tone - Need to ensure we don't let this profile expand outside of original scope
Order Matching
Presenter: Emma Jones
- Can be meds, or any type of order such as a "wound assessment"
- One of the challenges may be that the communication is about a particular order, but not necessarily a fullfillment of a given order
- Order for referral vs diagnostic study is the same
- committee agrees to combine this with referral matching, to be approached as one profile
Care Management Revision
- Coordinate w/HL7 Patient Care
- Need to consider other related profiles (RCG, RCK, etc)
- Perhaps this is a harmonization or white paper effort
- Concerns w/overlap or competition with current US initiatives (S&I Framework)
Diagnostic Study Request
Presenter: Vincent van Pelt