PCC PC ProposalWebinar 2012-10-19: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) Created page with "* Occupational Health (Lisa Nelson) ** This is not a new profile proposal, but is a rework of existing templates such that profiles that use those templates ** Is the sourcing/so..." |
Tsoutherland (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*** Answer(s): Yes, although others have some concerns; will continue to explore | *** Answer(s): Yes, although others have some concerns; will continue to explore | ||
* EHCP Evolution | |||
** No Discussion/questions | |||
* EHDI Workflow | * EHDI Workflow | ||
** Does this profile really belong in PCC? | |||
*** Answer: yes, because that is where the current technical expertise lies, although it likely will not live in the PCC TF, but instead in the QRPH TF | |||
** It could fit in PCC when considering the provider workflow pieces that are in this of this proposal | |||
*** Answer: agree | |||
** What is pulsoxymetry (sp?) doing as part of an EHCP profile? | |||
*** Answer: mistake/typo | |||
** Concerns in PCC around workload - let's consider assigning a resource from PCC to work with QRPH on this | |||
* Care Management Revision | |||
** Would the existing profile be sunsetted and this replace it? | |||
*** Answer: yes | |||
** Seems like a workflow profile for Care Management - why is it not presented as a workflow profile? | |||
*** not a matter of one provider saying to another "here's the plan" - this is more about configuring health IT systems to create connection. | |||
* DSR | |||
** | |||
Revision as of 11:11, 19 October 2012
- Occupational Health (Lisa Nelson)
- This is not a new profile proposal, but is a rework of existing templates such that profiles that use those templates
- Is the sourcing/source of information part of this? Can it be tracked back to the source of information?
- Answer: Vision is for it to work either way
- I understand NIOSH will be a consumer of this information - are there other potential consumers?
- Answer: Yes, NIOSH is an interested consumer of this information. OSHA and others are also interested in this information
- Why is this not coming in as a Change Proposal?
- Answer: Because this might overlap with other harmonization type work. CP avenue can certainly be utilized if that is what the committee feels is the best approach.
- How many templates are affected?
- Answer: one - Coded Social History
- What about the international perspective? How do you manage coding systems?
- Answer: carefully approaching this perspective, will utilize IHE regional extensions as needed.
- Why is this not a profile?
- Answer: goal is to affect only at the template level
- Will the information collected be clinically relevant?
- Answer(s): Yes, although others have some concerns; will continue to explore
- EHCP Evolution
- No Discussion/questions
- EHDI Workflow
- Does this profile really belong in PCC?
- Answer: yes, because that is where the current technical expertise lies, although it likely will not live in the PCC TF, but instead in the QRPH TF
- It could fit in PCC when considering the provider workflow pieces that are in this of this proposal
- Answer: agree
- What is pulsoxymetry (sp?) doing as part of an EHCP profile?
- Answer: mistake/typo
- Concerns in PCC around workload - let's consider assigning a resource from PCC to work with QRPH on this
- Does this profile really belong in PCC?
- Care Management Revision
- Would the existing profile be sunsetted and this replace it?
- Answer: yes
- Seems like a workflow profile for Care Management - why is it not presented as a workflow profile?
- not a matter of one provider saying to another "here's the plan" - this is more about configuring health IT systems to create connection.
- Would the existing profile be sunsetted and this replace it?
- DSR