Pharm Tech Agenda 2011.10.27: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Simon.letellier (talk | contribs)
Simon.letellier (talk | contribs)
Line 34: Line 34:
=== Change proposals===
=== Change proposals===


§  CP ballot #1 – Status (Jürgen)
==== CP ballot #1 – Status (Jürgen)====


§  CP for CMPD to incorporate XDW (Luca, Arianna, Jürgen)
==== CP for CMPD to incorporate XDW (Luca, Arianna, Jürgen)====


1.       See slides attached (Workflow in CMPD)
=====       See slides attached (Workflow in CMPD)=====


1.      ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Pharmacy/yr2_2010-2011/Technical Committee/ProfileWork/ContributionXDW/Workflow in CMPD.ppt
1.      ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Pharmacy/yr2_2010-2011/Technical Committee/ProfileWork/ContributionXDW/Workflow in CMPD.ppt


2.      Questions to be discussed:
===== Questions to be discussed:=====


1.      Basic workflow (see slides attached)
1.      Basic workflow (see slides attached)
Line 54: Line 54:
3.      Shall we use “in progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed”?
3.      Shall we use “in progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed”?


3.      ATTENTION: There will be a subsequent TCon just on this topic at Monday, Oct 31., 2011, 16:00 – 17:30 (Paris time)
===== ATTENTION =====
: There will be a subsequent TCon just on this topic at '''Monday, Oct 31., 2011, 16:00 – 17:30''' (Paris time)


=== Whitepapers===
=== Whitepapers===

Revision as of 17:13, 25 October 2011

Welcome

F2F meeting Paris, Oct 4./5., 2011

Approval of minutes

Day 1 : IHE Pharmacy F2F Meeting
Day 2 : IHE Pharmacy & HL7 Pharmacy Joint Meeting

Summary on major decisions

·

Schedule for season 2011/2012 (Jürgen)

See draft schedule attached (Schedule_2011-2012_v2)

·

Status overview

Change proposals

CP ballot #1 – Status (Jürgen)

CP for CMPD to incorporate XDW (Luca, Arianna, Jürgen)

See slides attached (Workflow in CMPD)

1. ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Pharmacy/yr2_2010-2011/Technical Committee/ProfileWork/ContributionXDW/Workflow in CMPD.ppt

Questions to be discussed:

1. Basic workflow (see slides attached)

1. Is it ok?

2. Shall it be required mandatory as the “minimum workflow” in the profile?

2. Shall there be one workflow document per prescription or one per prescription item?

3. Shall we use “in progress” states or leave all tasks as “born completed”?

ATTENTION
There will be a subsequent TCon just on this topic at Monday, Oct 31., 2011, 16:00 – 17:30 (Paris time)

Whitepapers

§ Medication Documentation (Marco, Ana, Jose)

§ Use-case: Community – Hospital, Step 1 (Orlando)

§ HMW Exceptional cases, Step 1 (Marc, Leonidas)

§ CMPD Exceptional cases, Step 1 (Jürgen, Leonidas)

§ Supply chain (Simon)

Work items

§ Perfusion administration / PCD Alignment (Marc, Vassil, Jürgen)

1. See excel attached (PHARM_HMW – PCD PIV-IPEC Mapping)

1. ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Pharmacy/yr2_2010-2011/Technical%20Committee/ProfileWork/PCD-HMW%20alignment/PHARM_HMW%20-%20PCD_PIV-IPEC%20Mapping.xls

2. See slides attached (Perfusion_in_HMW)

1. ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Pharmacy/yr2_2010-2011/Technical Committee/ProfileWork/PCD-HMW alignment/Perfusion_in_HMW.ppt

§ Glossary work item (Marco)


Any other business