Rad TF Maintenance 2011-12: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 32: Line 32:


Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
:* xx%  
:* 10% total for maintenance with new templates only for new supplements
:* 20% if we add adapting current trial implementation supplements to new templates


Responses to Issues:
Responses to Issues:

Revision as of 11:42, 19 October 2011

Target: Prepare CP's for Ballot for ?May? 2012

Number of outstanding CPs:

  • 20 Assigned CPs to work on (about 1/2 are stagnant)
  • 0 Completed CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked)
  • 2 Submitted CPs to review/assign
  • Update PERF to allow multiple objects per scan
  • Add Issuer of IDs to MWL


List of "non-trivial" CPs:

  • CP-xxx : Title (Author)
    • <Anyone have any in mind?>


List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:

  • <Anyone have any in mind?>

List of other maintenance tasks:

  • Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
  • Adoption of new IHE Templates <add link>
  • R2/RE Harmonization?

7. Risks

Any technical or political risks related to expected maintenance items?


9. Tech Cmte Evaluation

Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):

  • 10% total for maintenance with new templates only for new supplements
  • 20% if we add adapting current trial implementation supplements to new templates

Responses to Issues:

See italics in Risk and Open Issue sections

Candidate Editor:

Kevin O'Donnell