Foreign Exam Management: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DavidHeaney (talk | contribs) Created page with "__NOTOC__ ==1. Proposed Workitem: ''<initial working name for profile/whitepaper/etc>''== * Proposal Editor: David Heaney * Editor: ''<Name of candidate Lead Editor for the Pr..." |
DavidHeaney (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==1. Proposed Workitem: | ==1. Proposed Workitem: Foreign Exam Management== | ||
* Proposal Editor: David Heaney | * Proposal Editor: David Heaney | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history) | * Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history) | ||
* Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history) | * Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history) | ||
* Domain: Radiology | * Domain: Radiology | ||
==2. The Problem== | ==2. The Problem== | ||
Revision as of 17:39, 8 September 2011
1. Proposed Workitem: Foreign Exam Management
- Proposal Editor: David Heaney
- Editor: <Name of candidate Lead Editor for the Profile, if known>
- Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
- Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
- Domain: Radiology
2. The Problem
The current Import Reconciliation Workflow Profile does not cover many of the use cases or feature functionality desired by customers:
- Import of prior exams (via pre-fetch 'pull' or 'push' or from removable media)
- Users often want 'priors' to be handled differently by an Image Manager/Archive
- flushed from the system rather than archived
- configurable behavior on the timing for this flushing that differs from normal workflow exams
- flushing of foreign exam Study records from database rather than just deletion of image files/objects
- requirements around when and when not a new exam order is needed for such a foreign study
3. Key Use Case
A White Paper on foreign exam management had been circulated in the XDS Implementation Group. This outlines a number of use cases and scenarios. Here is a link to that white paper:
4. Standards and Systems
IRWF SWF XDS-I.b MIMA IOCM