PCCTech Minutes 2011 02 10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
** Hearing loss risk indicators is not fitting well within the PCC Assessments section which is focused on Nursing Battery. | ** Hearing loss risk indicators is not fitting well within the PCC Assessments section which is focused on Nursing Battery. | ||
** several instances want to use assessments, but they do not filt well so we need to create a more generalized assessment section that allows more flexibility with the level 3. | ** several instances want to use assessments, but they do not filt well so we need to create a more generalized assessment section that allows more flexibility with the level 3. | ||
** | ** | ||
*Joint call for PCC and QRPH scheduled for March 11 at 11 am Eastern. | |||
Revision as of 09:57, 10 February 2011
Onsite Attendees: Laura Bright, Laura Heermann, Audrey Dickerson, Anne Diamond, Mike McCoy, Keith Boone, Charles Rica
Call in Attendees: Philip DePalo, Tone Southerland, Marcia Veenstra, Amit Popat, Mary Jungers, Lisa Nelson, Wendy Bluminthal,
Joint with QRPH
- 1. Creating LDS samples that are populated enough to allow Lisa and NIST to create the appropriate validation tools for LDS
- 2. Address Wendy’s questions regarding PRPH-Ca
- Need text of a section to be at the observation level
- Detailed discussion and code reveiw/training done.
- 3. Address Assessments section
- Hearing loss risk indicators is not fitting well within the PCC Assessments section which is focused on Nursing Battery.
- several instances want to use assessments, but they do not filt well so we need to create a more generalized assessment section that allows more flexibility with the level 3.
- Joint call for PCC and QRPH scheduled for March 11 at 11 am Eastern.