PCCTech Minutes 2011 02 10: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
Joint with QRPH
Joint with QRPH
*1. Creating LDS samples that are populated enough to allow Lisa and NIST to create the appropriate validation tools for LDS
*1. Creating LDS samples that are populated enough to allow Lisa and NIST to create the appropriate validation tools for LDS
**
*2.  Address Wendy’s questions regarding PRPH-Ca
*2.  Address Wendy’s questions regarding PRPH-Ca
**  Need text of a section to be at the observation level
**  Need text of a section to be at the observation level
**  Detailed discussion and code reveiw/training done.
**  Detailed discussion and code reveiw/training done.
*3.  Address Assessments section
*3.  Address Assessments section  
** Hearing loss risk indicators is not fitting well within the PCC Assessments section which is focused on Nursing Battery. 
** several instances want to use assessments, but they do not filt well so we need to create a more generalized assessment section that allows more flexibility with the level 3. 
**

Revision as of 09:41, 10 February 2011

Onsite Attendees: Laura Bright, Laura Heermann, Audrey Dickerson, Anne Diamond, Mike McCoy, Keith Boone, Charles Rica

Call in Attendees: Philip DePalo, Tone Southerland, Marcia Veenstra, Amit Popat, Mary Jungers, Lisa Nelson, Wendy Bluminthal,

Joint with QRPH

  • 1. Creating LDS samples that are populated enough to allow Lisa and NIST to create the appropriate validation tools for LDS
  • 2. Address Wendy’s questions regarding PRPH-Ca
    • Need text of a section to be at the observation level
    • Detailed discussion and code reveiw/training done.
  • 3. Address Assessments section
    • Hearing loss risk indicators is not fitting well within the PCC Assessments section which is focused on Nursing Battery.
    • several instances want to use assessments, but they do not filt well so we need to create a more generalized assessment section that allows more flexibility with the level 3.