Reporting Whitepaper: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
Since this whitepaper is a contribution of IHE Radiology to the IHE Reporting Taskforce, the focus and viewpoint may reflect its origins.  Contributions from other Domains to fill in blind-spots and balance the viewpoint are welcome.
Since this whitepaper is a contribution of IHE Radiology to the IHE Reporting Taskforce, the focus and viewpoint may reflect its origins.  Contributions from other Domains to fill in blind-spots and balance the viewpoint are welcome.


==Reporting Whitepaper==
==Whitepaper Structure==


[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 1|'''Section 1''']] presents working premises.  That way if there is disagreement about the thinking/biases that underlie the whitepaper, they can be challenged and discussed directly.
[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 1|'''Section 1''']] presents working premises.  That way if there is disagreement about the thinking/biases that underlie the whitepaper, they can be challenged and discussed directly.
Line 23: Line 23:


[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 5|'''Section 5''']] presents and evaluates
[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 5|'''Section 5''']] presents and evaluates
* promising formats for encoding the data;  
:* promising formats for encoding the data;  
* promising mechanisms for transporting the encoded data from place to place; and
:* promising mechanisms for transporting the encoded data from place to place; and
* promising mechanisms for managing the workflow that surrounds the creation, manipulation and transportation of the data.
:* promising mechanisms for managing the workflow that surrounds the creation, manipulation and transportation of the data.


[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6|'''Section 6''']] introduces several different (Radiology) reporting environments, and describes how the technologies would be applied to their workflow/architecture.  The current “state of the art” may also be described to present a better picture of user expectations and current problems.
[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6|'''Section 6''']] introduces several different (Radiology) reporting environments, and describes how the technologies would be applied to their workflow/architecture.  The current “state of the art” may also be described to present a better picture of user expectations and current problems.


[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 7|'''Section 7''']] proposes activities to implement/deploy the conclusions above.
[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 7|'''Section 7''']] proposes activities to implement/deploy the conclusions above.

Revision as of 21:55, 5 May 2007

The optimistic goal of the whitepaper is to:

  • Describe the “problem” and related details
  • Break it down into component pieces
  • Document some technologies that could improve things
  • Propose some steps forward for coming years, including:
    • New IHE Profiles
    • IHE Profiles to be modified
    • IHE Profiles to be retired

The plan is to facilitate discussion with other IHE Domains and hopefully reach some cross-Domain consensus so we are moving in compatible directions.

Since this whitepaper is a contribution of IHE Radiology to the IHE Reporting Taskforce, the focus and viewpoint may reflect its origins. Contributions from other Domains to fill in blind-spots and balance the viewpoint are welcome.

Whitepaper Structure

Section 1 presents working premises. That way if there is disagreement about the thinking/biases that underlie the whitepaper, they can be challenged and discussed directly.

As a first step toward consensus on the nature of the problem:

Section 2 tries to nail down the Report itself (content)
Section 3 examines the Reporting Process (workflow/dataflow).

Section 4 describes individual technical issues which will need to be addressed.

Section 5 presents and evaluates

  • promising formats for encoding the data;
  • promising mechanisms for transporting the encoded data from place to place; and
  • promising mechanisms for managing the workflow that surrounds the creation, manipulation and transportation of the data.

Section 6 introduces several different (Radiology) reporting environments, and describes how the technologies would be applied to their workflow/architecture. The current “state of the art” may also be described to present a better picture of user expectations and current problems.

Section 7 proposes activities to implement/deploy the conclusions above.