Difference between revisions of "Rad Tech Minutes 2009.06.17"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:::* Committee will defer approval | :::* Committee will defer approval | ||
::* MR/CT Perfusion Imaging | ::* MR/CT Perfusion Imaging | ||
− | :::* | + | :::* ???? |
:* XDS-I.b | :* XDS-I.b | ||
::* Comments from Emmanuel Cordonnier of DICOM WG27 suggested language indicating that the profile is based on a provisional solution and awaiting outcome of DICOM WG27 | ::* Comments from Emmanuel Cordonnier of DICOM WG27 suggested language indicating that the profile is based on a provisional solution and awaiting outcome of DICOM WG27 | ||
::* Paul Seifert inserted text into the Introduction of the supplement to refer the DICOM WG27 activities | ::* Paul Seifert inserted text into the Introduction of the supplement to refer the DICOM WG27 activities | ||
+ | ::* ATNA Encryption Option: Rob Horn from ITI committee recommends leaving language as written | ||
+ | :::* Added language about the possibility that sites might opt for different security mechanisms (requirement to support TLS still holds for vendors) | ||
Revision as of 11:24, 17 June 2009
Attendees
- Chris Lindop - GE (co-chair)
- Kinson Ho - Agfa
- Tim Krehl - Sorna
- Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba
- Paul Seifert - Agfa
- Alexis Tzannes - Aware
- Lynn Felhofer - Technical Project Manager
- Chris Carr - RSNA
Minutes
- Quorum attained (5/9 member organizations with privileges present)
- Resolve Final Comments on supplements and vote whether to publish for Trial Implementation
- Enhanced DICOM objects
- MR Diffusion Imaging
- Changes have been made to section 4.16.4.2.2.6 Display of MR Diffusion Imaging Objects to make its requirements normative "shall"
- Committee expressed additional concerns about the clarity of the requirements stated in this section; Bas Revet, the author was not present to explain the text or adopt changes
- Committee will defer approval
- MR/CT Perfusion Imaging
- ????
- XDS-I.b
- Comments from Emmanuel Cordonnier of DICOM WG27 suggested language indicating that the profile is based on a provisional solution and awaiting outcome of DICOM WG27
- Paul Seifert inserted text into the Introduction of the supplement to refer the DICOM WG27 activities
- ATNA Encryption Option: Rob Horn from ITI committee recommends leaving language as written
- Added language about the possibility that sites might opt for different security mechanisms (requirement to support TLS still holds for vendors)