Rad Tech Minutes 2009.02.11: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* Segmentation: add open issue regarding what use case will be for ROI results | * Segmentation: add open issue regarding what use case will be for ROI results | ||
* Dependency table: no current dependencies on SWF or CPI | * Dependency table: no current dependencies on SWF or CPI | ||
* | * Profile title needs to convey use case addressed: | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 11 February 2009
Enhanced DICOM CT and MR Objects Profile Wrap-up Discussion
Attendees
- Dick Donker - Philips
- Brad Erickson - Mayo/RSNA RIC
- Lynn Felhofer - MIR
- Rob Horn - Agfa
- Tim Krehl - Sorna
- Kevin O'Donnell - Toshiba
- Michael Planchart - RiverRain
- Cyrus Samari - Sorna
- Kees Verduin - Philips
- Nichole Drye-Mayo - RSNA
- Chris Carr - RSNA
Minutes
- Reviewed remaining open issues and changes introduced during Technical Committee face-to-face meeting; including both substantive changes to the profile and editorial changes to the documentation.
- Segmentation: add open issue regarding what use case will be for ROI results
- Dependency table: no current dependencies on SWF or CPI
- Profile title needs to convey use case addressed: