Mammo Minutes 2008-09-23: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
Chrisdcarr (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
1) Committee Organization | 1) Committee Organization | ||
::* Reviewed roster and committee procedures | ::* Reviewed roster and committee procedures | ||
:::* Voting rights require regular attendance at committee meetings | :::* Voting rights require regular attendance at committee meetings: attendance at two consecutive events required to establish voting rights; three consecutive absences loses voting privileges | ||
:::* Committee members required to represent IHE Member Organizations: can apply for membership at [http://www.ihe.net/governance/ IHE Website] | :::* Committee members required to represent IHE Member Organizations: can apply for membership at [http://www.ihe.net/governance/ IHE Website] | ||
:::* | :::* Chris Carr to update roster and attendance | ||
:::* Chris Carr to contact Co-chairs (Rita Zuley and Nikos Gkanatsios) about continued participation; solicit nominations for one co-chair position | |||
2) General Committee Strategy: Develop new profiles or focus on implementation of existing profiles? | 2) General Committee Strategy: Develop new profiles or focus on implementation of existing profiles? | ||
| Line 27: | Line 28: | ||
3) [[Mammography_Reporting_Workflow_-_Brief_Proposal| Mammography Reporting Workflow proposal]] | 3) [[Mammography_Reporting_Workflow_-_Brief_Proposal| Mammography Reporting Workflow proposal]] | ||
::* Reviewed profile proposal by Dr. Ellis | ::* Reviewed profile proposal by Dr. Ellis | ||
:::* Needs to be coordinated with Reporting Workflow | :::* Needs to be evaluated and discussed before a detailed proposal could be developed | ||
::::* Not clear what standards should be used; eg, what should be translation point between DICOM and HL7 | |||
::::* Workstations have access to DICOM images, whereas reporting systems may not | |||
:::* Profile would need to be coordinated with existing Radiology Reporting Workflow profile and other work on workflow standards and structured medical documents | |||
::* Preference of group on the call is to take the 2008-2009 cycle to develop a coordinated approach to reporting workflow and structured reports | |||
4) Development Timeline: meetings and teleconferences | 4) Development Timeline: meetings and teleconferences | ||
::* Members on call not able to commit to | |||
5) Mammo demonstration at SBI 2009 | 5) Mammo demonstration at SBI 2009 | ||
Revision as of 15:16, 23 September 2008
Attendees
- Penny Butler - ACR
- Christoph Dickmann - Siemens
- Barbara Hirsch - ACR
- Renate Hoecker - Siemens
- Richard Kaczmarek - US FDA
- Janet Keyes - Hologic
- Chris Lindop - GE
- Paul Morgan - Fujifilm
- Bas Revet - Philips
- Judy Wolfman, MD - Northwestern Univ.
- Chris Carr - RSNA
Minutes
1) Committee Organization
- Reviewed roster and committee procedures
- Voting rights require regular attendance at committee meetings: attendance at two consecutive events required to establish voting rights; three consecutive absences loses voting privileges
- Committee members required to represent IHE Member Organizations: can apply for membership at IHE Website
- Chris Carr to update roster and attendance
- Chris Carr to contact Co-chairs (Rita Zuley and Nikos Gkanatsios) about continued participation; solicit nominations for one co-chair position
2) General Committee Strategy: Develop new profiles or focus on implementation of existing profiles?
- Mammo Workflow Profile needs to be implemented and promoted, which will require considerable manpower
- DICOM CPs out for ballot that are required to implement Mammo Workflow; challenge to implement by February Connectathon
- Consolidation year; evaluate reporting issues and develop white paper for development
3) Mammography Reporting Workflow proposal
- Reviewed profile proposal by Dr. Ellis
- Needs to be evaluated and discussed before a detailed proposal could be developed
- Not clear what standards should be used; eg, what should be translation point between DICOM and HL7
- Workstations have access to DICOM images, whereas reporting systems may not
- Profile would need to be coordinated with existing Radiology Reporting Workflow profile and other work on workflow standards and structured medical documents
- Preference of group on the call is to take the 2008-2009 cycle to develop a coordinated approach to reporting workflow and structured reports
4) Development Timeline: meetings and teleconferences
- Members on call not able to commit to
5) Mammo demonstration at SBI 2009