Difference between revisions of "Tools"
m (Wiki Process moved to Wiki Usage: More accurate) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | This page explains how certain things should be accomplished on the Wiki and how the Wiki fits in with www.ihe.net, ftp.ihe.net, forums.rsna.org, the mailing lists and the Google groups. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==What happens where== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''<Insert table from ppt>''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Page Naming Conventions== | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''<Some naming conventions are already listed in the relevant page templates>''' | ||
==Revision Reference Points== | ==Revision Reference Points== | ||
− | Wiki pages | + | An plus & minus of Wiki pages is that they more dynamic than other modes of collaboration. |
+ | |||
+ | For certain pages, it may be useful to periodically benchmark a version that everyone has agreed to, but still not prevent further contributions and collaboration. | ||
− | + | A "notary" (e.g. Chris or Didi) could edit the page and save it with a Summary comment or "OFFICIAL" or "CONCENSUS" or somthing. | |
− | |||
− | + | This would allow people to continue to provisionally evolve the page contents, but if anyone wanted to see the last version that everyone officially agreed to, they could click on "history" and click the last version edited by a notary as "OFFICIAL". Further, you can use the comparison feature to see the delta of what has changed since. | |
− |
Revision as of 18:21, 14 December 2006
This page explains how certain things should be accomplished on the Wiki and how the Wiki fits in with www.ihe.net, ftp.ihe.net, forums.rsna.org, the mailing lists and the Google groups.
What happens where
<Insert table from ppt>
Page Naming Conventions
<Some naming conventions are already listed in the relevant page templates>
Revision Reference Points
An plus & minus of Wiki pages is that they more dynamic than other modes of collaboration.
For certain pages, it may be useful to periodically benchmark a version that everyone has agreed to, but still not prevent further contributions and collaboration.
A "notary" (e.g. Chris or Didi) could edit the page and save it with a Summary comment or "OFFICIAL" or "CONCENSUS" or somthing.
This would allow people to continue to provisionally evolve the page contents, but if anyone wanted to see the last version that everyone officially agreed to, they could click on "history" and click the last version edited by a notary as "OFFICIAL". Further, you can use the comparison feature to see the delta of what has changed since.