Final Text Process: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
At some point, a Trial Implementation supplement will be ready for consideration as a Final Text candidate.
At some point, a Trial Implementation supplement will be ready for consideration as a Final Text candidate.


* Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
* Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda (April-May)
** pre-requisite: after Public Comment resolution meeting (April-May)
** scheduling pre-requisite: after Public Comment resolution meeting (March)
** pre-requisite: after Connectathons (NA=Jan, EU=Apr)
** input pre-requisite: Deal with CPs against the profile.
* ? Announce intention to review for Final Text ?
** input pre-requisite: after Connectathons (NA=Jan, EU=Apr)
 
* Announce intention to review for Final Text (announce in mid-Feb)
 
* Run down the checklist for each profile
* Run down the checklist for each profile
** require the profile be through a Connectathon in at least two regions
** has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions
** require the profile has been tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon.
** has the profile been tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon.
** require at least an extra year if no existing target product had previously implemented the an underlying standard
** have the standards underlying the profile been previously implemented in a system/product in our domain (expand on the issue of testing the standard and testing the profile)
** prefer existence of at least two independent implementations
** has each actor in the profile been implemented independently at least twice
** would be nice to wait if no one has implementation plans, but it’s hard to ask about that
** have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)
** prefer at least one of each actor has been released in the market but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT
** ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
* Debate exceptions
** Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile
 
* Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)
* Hold and record formal vote
* Hold and record formal vote
* Communicate results to TC


* Publish on ihe.net
Tech Cmte.
* Prepare Final Text Supplement
* Publish Final Text on ihe.net
* Announce publication
* Announce publication
'''''<Discuss whether you can put an Integration Statement up for a TI Profile?  Would need to review and either remove IS or change implementation based on Final Text>'''''

Revision as of 17:53, 8 November 2006

<Note: All Process pages are very much Strawman documents>

At some point, a Trial Implementation supplement will be ready for consideration as a Final Text candidate.

  • Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda (April-May)
    • scheduling pre-requisite: after Public Comment resolution meeting (March)
    • input pre-requisite: Deal with CPs against the profile.
    • input pre-requisite: after Connectathons (NA=Jan, EU=Apr)
  • Announce intention to review for Final Text (announce in mid-Feb)
  • Run down the checklist for each profile
    • has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions
    • has the profile been tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon.
    • have the standards underlying the profile been previously implemented in a system/product in our domain (expand on the issue of testing the standard and testing the profile)
    • has each actor in the profile been implemented independently at least twice
    • have at least one of each actor been released in the market (but Vendors may not want to publish integration statement if it’s not FT)
    • ?? Have any complaints been raised against the profile ??
    • Are there any outstanding CPs against the profile
  • Debate exceptions (failure of the above is cause for discussion)
  • Hold and record formal vote
  • Communicate results to TC

Tech Cmte.

  • Prepare Final Text Supplement
  • Publish Final Text on ihe.net
  • Announce publication

<Discuss whether you can put an Integration Statement up for a TI Profile? Would need to review and either remove IS or change implementation based on Final Text>