PERF Evaluation: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:


Reviewed by IHE RAD Tech on April 3, 2025:
Reviewed by IHE RAD Tech on April 3, 2025:
==Proposal==
The [https://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/Radiology/IHE_RAD_Suppl_PERF.pdf CT/MR Perfusion Imaging with Contrast ] profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Wim Corbijn)
Per the [[Final Text Process]], <font color="blue">Items in blue text</font> below warrant Committee discussion.
== Technical Committee Checklist ==


'''Decision:'''
'''Decision:'''

Revision as of 20:12, 2 April 2025

CT/MR Perfusion Imaging with Contrast (PERF) Final Text Evaluation

Reviewed by IHE RAD Tech on April 3, 2025:

Proposal

The CT/MR Perfusion Imaging with Contrast profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Wim Corbijn) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

Technical Committee Checklist

Decision:

  • Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
    • Currently no active CPs
  • Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
    • Currently no active CPs
  • Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
    • No open comments identified
  • Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
    • No open issues, all issues are closed.
  • Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
    • not aware of any issues left from the Connectathons.
  • Gather feedback from implementers. Your domain secretary has access to the contact information for vendors that have tested your profile at previous Connectathons and can help coordinate reaching out.
    • No further feedback identified. Latest testing done in 2014 and 2017 Connectathons.
  • Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
    • ??