Rad Tech Minutes 2021-11-07-11: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Profile Name: '''Reporting Worklist Prioritization''' | |||
* Describe gaps in Use Case coverage | * Describe gaps in Use Case coverage | ||
: Feels complete (currently) | : Feels complete (currently) | ||
* Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each? | * Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each? | ||
: Done. Yes. | |||
* Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right? | * Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right? | ||
: | |||
* Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose? | * Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose? | ||
: | |||
* Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks | * Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks | ||
: | |||
* Describe potential practical issues | * Describe potential practical issues | ||
: | |||
* Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete | * Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete | ||
: Need to move some notes up into open issues. Otherwise OK? | |||
* Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist? | * Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist? | ||
: | |||
* How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?) | * How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?) | ||
: Time to spare (at this stage) | |||
* How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?) | * How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?) | ||
: Right | |||
* If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop? | * If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop? | ||
: Patient History, Imaging Priors, Lab/Path feeds. May still end up with those out of scope. | |||
* Have the promised resources manifested? | * Have the promised resources manifested? | ||
: Mostly. Will follow up with radiology input. | |||
* What tasks would benefit from additional expertise? | * What tasks would benefit from additional expertise? | ||
: More reporting worklist vendors | |||
* What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many. | * What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many. | ||
: | |||
* Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap | * Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap | ||
: Yes | |||
* Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap | * Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap | ||
: Yes (being small and focused helps) | |||
* How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting? | * How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting? | ||
: Maybe 1 or 2 in January | |||
Profile Name: | |||
* Describe gaps in Use Case coverage | |||
: | |||
* Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each? | |||
: | |||
* Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right? | |||
: | |||
* Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose? | |||
: | |||
* Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks | |||
: | |||
* Describe potential practical issues | |||
: | |||
* Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete | |||
: | |||
* Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist? | |||
: | |||
* How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?) | |||
: | |||
* How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?) | |||
: | |||
* If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop? | |||
: | |||
* Have the promised resources manifested? | |||
: | |||
* What tasks would benefit from additional expertise? | |||
: | |||
* What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many. | |||
: | |||
* Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap | |||
: | |||
* Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap | |||
: | |||
* How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting? | |||
: | |||
Revision as of 22:31, 9 November 2022
- Attendance List
- Kevin O'Donnell
- David Kwan
- Khalid Younis
- Andrei Leontiev
- Wim
- Brad Geneereaux
- Lynn Felhofer
- Steve Nichols
- Jonathan Whitby
- Kinson Ho
- Matt Hayes
- Eric Martin - Guest
- Jamie Dulkowski
- TeRhonda McGee
Profile Name: Reporting Worklist Prioritization
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Feels complete (currently)
- Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each?
- Done. Yes.
- Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right?
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- Describe potential practical issues
- Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete
- Need to move some notes up into open issues. Otherwise OK?
- Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist?
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- Time to spare (at this stage)
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- Right
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- Patient History, Imaging Priors, Lab/Path feeds. May still end up with those out of scope.
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- Mostly. Will follow up with radiology input.
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- More reporting worklist vendors
- What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many.
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
- Yes
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap
- Yes (being small and focused helps)
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?
- Maybe 1 or 2 in January
Profile Name:
- Describe gaps in Use Case coverage
- Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Is there a resolution plan for each?
- Do the effort points in the evaluation still seem right?
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- Describe unresolved technical issues/tasks
- Describe potential practical issues
- Review the open issue list. Does it feel complete
- Which open issues feel most risky; what other risks exist?
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- How does the scope feel? (Room to expand? Just right? Pretty ambitious?)
- If you had to reduce scope, what would you drop?
- Have the promised resources manifested?
- What tasks would benefit from additional expertise?
- What vendors are engaged for each actor? Record how many.
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the Kickoff meeting (See "Kickoff Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the Kickoff meeting, if not what was the gap
- How many tcons would you like between now and the PC Prep Meeting?