PCC TF-1/PHLAB/XDSLAB Harmonization: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Srrenly (talk | contribs)
Srrenly (talk | contribs)
Line 4: Line 4:


= Intro =
= Intro =
The use of explicit content modules in XDS-LAB will help other domains that are incorporating laboratory data be consistent.
The use of content modules in XDS-Lab helps lab remain consistent with what other domains have accomplished as well as insures that the lab domain provides guidance to the other domains that as they incorporate relevant laboratory data into their content profiles.


* Provide purpose to section of CDA (see annotation comment)
Benefits:
* Consistency with work done in other domains (see annotation comment)
* Provide guidance to other domains incorporating laboratory data (example ?)
* Provide context to section of CDA (see intended recipient)
* Provide context to section of CDA (see intended recipient)


= Annotation Comment (PCC) =
= Annotation Comment (PCC) =

Revision as of 10:15, 4 December 2007

Back to: PCC_TF-1/PHLAB

Intro

The use of content modules in XDS-Lab helps lab remain consistent with what other domains have accomplished as well as insures that the lab domain provides guidance to the other domains that as they incorporate relevant laboratory data into their content profiles.

Benefits:

  • Consistency with work done in other domains (see annotation comment)
  • Provide guidance to other domains incorporating laboratory data (example ?)
  • Provide context to section of CDA (see intended recipient)

Annotation Comment (PCC)

Laboratory reports come with at least 3 tiers of comments (result, test, report). We would like XDS-Lab to adopt an adaptation (CP potential!) of [PCC-TF Annotation Comment content module] for test and report comments and to provide samples demonstrating Level 3 references to Level 2 content.


Result and Test level comments

XDS-Lab

  • result - footNote
  • test - similiar to PCC-TF Annotation comment with proposal to extend schema on the observation

We recommend placing test level comments them within the observation/

block using <tfoot> blocks. For consistency, we recommend re-use of the existing PCC-TF Annotation Comment content module within Level 3 Entry linked to the Report_Entry <entry><act> and <><> as shown in this example. This example provides a reason for adaptation to the current content module.
<ClinicalDocument
  ...
  <component typeCode="COMP">
    <structuredBody classCode="DOCBODY" moodCode="EVN">
      <component typeCode="COMP">
        <section classCode="DOCSECT">
          ...
          <text>
            <table>
              <thead ID="rabiesTest">
                <tr>
                  <th>Rabies Virus</th>
                  <th>Subject</th>
                  <th>Comments</th>
                </tr>
              </thead>
              <tfoot>
                <tr>
                  <td>Repeat confirmed negative</td>
                </tr>
              </tfoot>
              <tbody>
                <tr>
                  <td>Rabies virus not found.</td>
                  <td>ferret</td>
                  <td>Reagent lot 34</td>
                </tr>
              </tbody>
            </table>
            <paragraph ID="sComment">Report level comment goes here.</paragraph>
          </text>
          ...
          <entry typeCode="DRIV">
            <templateId extension="Lab.Report.Data.Processing.Entry" root="1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.3"/>
            <act classCode="ACT" moodCode="EVN">
             ...
              <entryRelationship typeCode="COMP">
                <observation classCode="OBS" moodCode="EVN">
                  <code code="C58990" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.1" codeSystemName="LOINC" displayName="Rabies Test">
                    <originalText><reference value="rabiesTest"/></originalText>
                  </code>
                  <text>Reagent lot 34</text>
                  <statusCode code="completed"/>
                  <effectiveTime value="20071108000000.0000-0500"/>
                  <value xsi:type="CE" code="59881000" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.96" codeSystemName="SNOMED" 
                                       displayName="Rabies Virus"/>
                  <entryRelationship typeCode="COMP">
                    <act classCode="ACT" moodCode="EVN">
                      <templateId root='2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.1.40'/>
                      <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.2'/>
                      <code code="48767-8" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.1" codeSystemName="LOINC" displayName="Annotation Comment"/>
                      <text>Repeat confirmed negative</text>
                    </act>
                  </entryRelationship>
                </observation>
              </entryRelationship>


Report level comment

XDS-Lab report level comments are placed within the <text> block using <paragraph> blocks. For consistency, we recommend re-use of the existing PCC Annotation Comment content module within Level 3 Entry linked to the Report_Entry <entry><act> as shown in this example.


<ClinicalDocument
  ...
  <component typeCode="COMP">
    <structuredBody classCode="DOCBODY" moodCode="EVN">
      <component typeCode="COMP">
        <section classCode="DOCSECT">
          ...
          <text>
            ...
            <paragraph ID="sComment">Report level comment goes here.</paragraph>
            ...
          </text>
          ...
          <entry typeCode="DRIV">
            <templateId extension="Lab.Report.Data.Processing.Entry" root="1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.3"/>
            <act classCode="ACT" moodCode="EVN">
             ...
             <entryRelationship typeCode="COMP">
               <act classCode="ACT" moodCode="EVN">
                 <templateId root='2.16.840.1.113883.10.20.1.40'/>
                 <templateId root='1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.4.2'/>
                 <code code="48767-8" codeSystem="2.16.840.1.113883.6.1" codeSystemName="LOINC" displayName="Annotation Comment">
                   <originalText><reference value="sComment"/></originalText>
                 </code>
                 <text>Report level comment goes here.</text>
                 <statusCode code='completed' />
               </act>
             </entryRelationship>

Intended Recipient

The intended recipients of a laboratory document are intended for a reason which is not currently conveyed in the standard mark up.

  • Per request of ordering physician
    • unknown relationship to patient
    • patient's primary care provider (PCP)
    • patient's specialist
  • Per requirement
    • infection control
    • notifiable to public health program


Laboratory Observation

  • sondra to fill in here


Laboratory Organizer

  • sondra to fill in here


Laboratory Organizer - Isolate Organizer

  • sondra to fill in here

Notifiable Condition

  • sondra to fill in here

Referral Ordering Physician

  • sondra to fill in here

Specimen

  • sondra to fill in here

Specimen Collection DateTime

  • sondra to fill in here

Specimen Receive DateTime

  • sondra to fill in here