SWF.b FT Evaluation

Proposal

The Scheduled Workflow.b profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Steve Nichols) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.

Technical Committee Checklist

• Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?

• Steve to add

• Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?

• Steve to add

• Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?

• Yes

• Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?

• Steve to add

• Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?

• After checking with Lynn Felhofer, all connectathon issues have been addressed through CPs

• Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants

• See above

• Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?

• See above

Technical Committee Consensus

• The Technical Committee agreed to continue with the Final Text Process and continue with an evaluation by the Planning Committee

Planning Committee Checklist

• Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions? • Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon? • Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested? • Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon? • Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT? • (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?) • Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved? • Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile