Difference between revisions of "PCC TC Face to Face February 25-March 01, 2019 - Minutes"
Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
* Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update. | * Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update. | ||
* A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site. | * A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site. | ||
+ | * Voting session: Move DCP Profile Volume 1 forward so Volume 2 can be started. | ||
+ | ** Corum (5 persons) | ||
+ | ** All for, no abstention, no opposition | ||
+ | |||
'''CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)''' | '''CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)''' | ||
* Meeting with QRPH domain : [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2019_2020_YR_13/QRPH%20Technical/Vol1/19-02-20%20CCG%20Profile%20draft%20v0.1.docx CCG volume 1] | * Meeting with QRPH domain : [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2019_2020_YR_13/QRPH%20Technical/Vol1/19-02-20%20CCG%20Profile%20draft%20v0.1.docx CCG volume 1] | ||
− | + | ||
+ | '''DCTM - Dynamic Care Planning''' |
Revision as of 12:12, 27 February 2019
Day 1 - Monday 2019 2 25 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting
Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)
DCP - Dynamic Care Planning
DCTM - Dynamic Care Team Management
- DCTM Volume 1 and presentation
- DCTM is a workflow profile
- Open issue : Shall we combine DCP and DCTM together ?
- DCP profile has been updated to include DCTM actors, uses cases...
- Volume 2 discussion : should the participant roles need to be collected when the care team is generated ?
Care Team section
- Care Team Section
- Purpose : add entries to Care Team Section
CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)
- Meeting with QRPH domain : CCG volume 1
- CCG is a high level collaboration between WHO, CDC and IHE Int. to make computable guidelines. Uses cases are based on WHO's guidelines (HIV, diabetes, hypertension)
- Actors of DCP's profile have been incorporated in CCG
Discussion and Documentation of Continuous Cycle
- PCC domain discuss on ITI continuous development
- The proposal is to move to a model where new work items can be started at any point in the year. The three 5-day face-to-face working meetings in the first half of the calendar year, plus two 2-day selection meetings in the last calendar quarter, are replaced by four 5-day working meetings evenly spaced through the year.
- Governance and process are not changing
- PCC domain agree on:
- Approved Projects must submit their developed work two weeks prior to Face-to-face meeting (call for proposals).
- Approved Projects must progress. Any project that misses two face-to-face meetings in a row will be canceled.
- Projects will not progress each quarter -- more than one quarter without improvement shall be automatic termination of that project.
- Connectathon is based on face-to-face meeting at-least four months prior to Connectathon.
- For DCTM and AADC new proposals, as we have no call proposal, PCC domain will discuss on them during this F2F meeting.
- Decisions
- PCC domain will make a call for proposal for the Spring meetings (April 29 - May 3, 2019, Oak Brook IL).
- PCC domain will schedule monthly calls to monitor progress on CPs and profiles
New Business, other projects
- Most systems only display only the text sections of a CDA. End users only see the documents.
- The main problem is to better specifying content and uses of data instead of just rendering the data
- PCC RECON profil speaks about reconciliation uses cases. It gives concepts on reconciliation without technical details. RECON profile have not been tested at the connectathon.
- How to make "data import from CDA" testable for the connectathon ? Connectathon is a great place to do content tests.
- Should PCC write a guideline for data import from CDA document ?
Day 2 - Tuesday 2019 2 26 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting
Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Keith Boone (Audacious Inquiry), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)
Discussion on QEDm comment
- Participants: same + John Moehrke, Charles Parisot (GE)
- John Moehrke has posted a Comment on QEDm in the PCC technical group (22th February 2019):
- Currently QEDm does not constrain the FHIR Resources. This has been deliberately done due to the limited experience (Trial Implementation) with these FHIR Resources.
- Such as requiring that Observations must use LOINC where ever possible. etc. See US-Core profile for some good baseline constraints.
- Is this lack of constraints intended or a missed opportunity to drive good quality FHIR Resource data?
- Resolution:
- There will be an effort during the spring and summer of 2019 to add constraints on the FHIR Resources.
- These constraints will be international, with support for Volume 4 regional constraints.
- These constraints will be based on original QED use-cases, original QED constraints, HL7 Implementation Guide for US-Core, and regional experience.
- All are encouraged to participate in this effort. Participate by joining the PCC technical workgroup, and by interacting with the IHE Git Hub
DCP-Dynamic Care Plan and DCTM-Dynamic Care Team management
- Participants : same + Charles Parisot (GE)
- Summary of DCP profile:
- DCP is a FHIR based profile to exchange care plans for a patient.
- DCP is a "meta-profile" including actors from DCTM profile.
- Summary of DCTM profile:
- DCTM is a profile to assign care team members to a patient to provide, care, care coordination ...
- Care team should be structured, historical log of care teams. create a new care team resource when, it changes and make inactive the old one.
- When a patient get discharged, the patient care team will be updated with the new members.
- This profile is based on HL7's care Team DAM
- DCP profile work
- DCP is a meta-profile that contains the DCTM actors and transactions. DCTM is a separate profile become some systems (like Scheduling systems) only managing.
- CareTeam Service actor and Care Plan Service actor are kept separate
- Because of complexity of Care plan deployment, different systems these two actors : care team service could be an administrative management and care plan service is a EMR system
- CarePlan Contributor actor and Care team Contributor have been grouped
- Next steps : implements the changes and clean up the grouping
Profile proposal: AADC-Assessment Acquisition and Data Collection
- Proposed Work Item: Assessment Acquisition and Data Collection
- Proposal editor : Keith Boone
- Profile editor : Keith Boone
- Other contributor : TBA
- Domain : PCC
- This profile propose to make assessments instruments (like Glasgow or Apgar score) in a computable form
- Standard and system : FHIR based profile
- FHIR Questionnaire, Questionnaire response
- FHIR Patient reported outcomes
- FHIR Structured Data Capture (originally CDA based)
- technical aspects : new Actors
- Assessment repository
- Assessment consumer
- Assessment requestor
- Assessor
- A detail proposal will be reviewed on Wednesday.
CPs session and PCC FHIR based profiles update
- CP-PCC-0273: typo error in the example
- Assigned to Michaël Clifton
- Incorporated in CDA Content Module
- FHIR DSTU-3 PCC profiles need to be updated on FHIR v4 (tracking is in the CP tracking spreadsheet)
- CMAP assigned to Keith Boone
- DCP assigned to Emma Jones
- DCTM assigned to Emma Jones
- PCS
- PMDT
- QEDm assigned to John M.
- RECON assigned to Emma Jones
- RIPT
Day 3 - Wednesday 2019 2 27 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting
Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)
DCP - Dynamic Care Planning
- Update Care Plan Servivce and care Team service are not grouped
- Additional transactions will be added in volume 2
- This profile will be tested at the next HL7's connectathon.
- Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update.
- A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site.
- Voting session: Move DCP Profile Volume 1 forward so Volume 2 can be started.
- Corum (5 persons)
- All for, no abstention, no opposition
CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)
- Meeting with QRPH domain : CCG volume 1
DCTM - Dynamic Care Planning