Difference between revisions of "PCC TC Face to Face February 25-March 01, 2019 - Minutes"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 137: Line 137:
 
* Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update.  
 
* Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update.  
 
* A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site.
 
* A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site.
 +
* Voting session: Move DCP Profile Volume 1 forward so Volume 2 can be started.
 +
** Corum (5 persons)
 +
** All for, no abstention, no opposition
 +
  
 
'''CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)'''
 
'''CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)'''
 
* Meeting with QRPH domain : [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2019_2020_YR_13/QRPH%20Technical/Vol1/19-02-20%20CCG%20Profile%20draft%20v0.1.docx CCG volume 1]
 
* Meeting with QRPH domain : [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Quality/2019_2020_YR_13/QRPH%20Technical/Vol1/19-02-20%20CCG%20Profile%20draft%20v0.1.docx CCG volume 1]
*
+
 
 +
'''DCTM - Dynamic Care Planning'''

Revision as of 12:12, 27 February 2019

Day 1 - Monday 2019 2 25 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting

Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)

DCP - Dynamic Care Planning


DCTM - Dynamic Care Team Management

  • DCTM Volume 1 and presentation
  • DCTM is a workflow profile
  • Open issue : Shall we combine DCP and DCTM together ?
  • DCP profile has been updated to include DCTM actors, uses cases...
  • Volume 2 discussion : should the participant roles need to be collected when the care team is generated ?

Care Team section


CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)

  • Meeting with QRPH domain : CCG volume 1
  • CCG is a high level collaboration between WHO, CDC and IHE Int. to make computable guidelines. Uses cases are based on WHO's guidelines (HIV, diabetes, hypertension)
  • Actors of DCP's profile have been incorporated in CCG


Discussion and Documentation of Continuous Cycle

  • PCC domain discuss on ITI continuous development
  • The proposal is to move to a model where new work items can be started at any point in the year. The three 5-day face-to-face working meetings in the first half of the calendar year, plus two 2-day selection meetings in the last calendar quarter, are replaced by four 5-day working meetings evenly spaced through the year.
  • Governance and process are not changing
  • PCC domain agree on:
    • Approved Projects must submit their developed work two weeks prior to Face-to-face meeting (call for proposals).
    • Approved Projects must progress. Any project that misses two face-to-face meetings in a row will be canceled.
    • Projects will not progress each quarter -- more than one quarter without improvement shall be automatic termination of that project.
    • Connectathon is based on face-to-face meeting at-least four months prior to Connectathon.
  • For DCTM and AADC new proposals, as we have no call proposal, PCC domain will discuss on them during this F2F meeting.
  • Decisions
    • PCC domain will make a call for proposal for the Spring meetings (April 29 - May 3, 2019, Oak Brook IL).
    • PCC domain will schedule monthly calls to monitor progress on CPs and profiles

New Business, other projects

  • Most systems only display only the text sections of a CDA. End users only see the documents.
  • The main problem is to better specifying content and uses of data instead of just rendering the data
  • PCC RECON profil speaks about reconciliation uses cases. It gives concepts on reconciliation without technical details. RECON profile have not been tested at the connectathon.
  • How to make "data import from CDA" testable for the connectathon ? Connectathon is a great place to do content tests.
  • Should PCC write a guideline for data import from CDA document ?


Day 2 - Tuesday 2019 2 26 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting

Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Keith Boone (Audacious Inquiry), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)


Discussion on QEDm comment

  • Participants: same + John Moehrke, Charles Parisot (GE)
  • John Moehrke has posted a Comment on QEDm in the PCC technical group (22th February 2019):
    • Currently QEDm does not constrain the FHIR Resources. This has been deliberately done due to the limited experience (Trial Implementation) with these FHIR Resources.
    • Such as requiring that Observations must use LOINC where ever possible. etc. See US-Core profile for some good baseline constraints.
    • Is this lack of constraints intended or a missed opportunity to drive good quality FHIR Resource data?
  • Resolution:
    • There will be an effort during the spring and summer of 2019 to add constraints on the FHIR Resources.
    • These constraints will be international, with support for Volume 4 regional constraints.
    • These constraints will be based on original QED use-cases, original QED constraints, HL7 Implementation Guide for US-Core, and regional experience.
    • All are encouraged to participate in this effort. Participate by joining the PCC technical workgroup, and by interacting with the IHE Git Hub


DCP-Dynamic Care Plan and DCTM-Dynamic Care Team management

  • Participants : same + Charles Parisot (GE)
  • Summary of DCP profile:
    • DCP is a FHIR based profile to exchange care plans for a patient.
    • DCP is a "meta-profile" including actors from DCTM profile.
  • Summary of DCTM profile:
    • DCTM is a profile to assign care team members to a patient to provide, care, care coordination ...
    • Care team should be structured, historical log of care teams. create a new care team resource when, it changes and make inactive the old one.
    • When a patient get discharged, the patient care team will be updated with the new members.
    • This profile is based on HL7's care Team DAM
  • DCP profile work
    • DCP is a meta-profile that contains the DCTM actors and transactions. DCTM is a separate profile become some systems (like Scheduling systems) only managing.
    • CareTeam Service actor and Care Plan Service actor are kept separate
      • Because of complexity of Care plan deployment, different systems these two actors : care team service could be an administrative management and care plan service is a EMR system
    • CarePlan Contributor actor and Care team Contributor have been grouped
  • Next steps : implements the changes and clean up the grouping

Profile proposal: AADC-Assessment Acquisition and Data Collection

  • Proposed Work Item: Assessment Acquisition and Data Collection
    • Proposal editor : Keith Boone
    • Profile editor : Keith Boone
    • Other contributor : TBA
    • Domain : PCC
    • This profile propose to make assessments instruments (like Glasgow or Apgar score) in a computable form
  • Standard and system : FHIR based profile
    • FHIR Questionnaire, Questionnaire response
    • FHIR Patient reported outcomes
    • FHIR Structured Data Capture (originally CDA based)
  • technical aspects : new Actors
    • Assessment repository
    • Assessment consumer
    • Assessment requestor
    • Assessor
  • A detail proposal will be reviewed on Wednesday.


CPs session and PCC FHIR based profiles update

  • CP-PCC-0273: typo error in the example
    • Assigned to Michaël Clifton
    • Incorporated in CDA Content Module
  • FHIR DSTU-3 PCC profiles need to be updated on FHIR v4 (tracking is in the CP tracking spreadsheet)
    • CMAP assigned to Keith Boone
    • DCP assigned to Emma Jones
    • DCTM assigned to Emma Jones
    • PCS
    • PMDT
    • QEDm assigned to John M.
    • RECON assigned to Emma Jones
    • RIPT



Day 3 - Wednesday 2019 2 27 - IHE PCC Tech Committee F2F RSNA Meeting

Participants: Emma Jones (Allscripts), Michael Clifton (Epic), Amit Trivedi(Himss), Thierry Dart (ASIP Santé) On Phone: Georges Dixon (Allscripts)

DCP - Dynamic Care Planning

  • Update Care Plan Servivce and care Team service are not grouped
  • Additional transactions will be added in volume 2
  • This profile will be tested at the next HL7's connectathon.
  • Volume 1 will be with the revision marks to help the DCTM update.
  • A update of volume 1 is on the FTP site.
  • Voting session: Move DCP Profile Volume 1 forward so Volume 2 can be started.
    • Corum (5 persons)
    • All for, no abstention, no opposition


CCG - Computable Care Guidelines (QRPH domain)

DCTM - Dynamic Care Planning