ITI Planning 26Oct07 Notes: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Mnusbaum (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Mnusbaum (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:
==Referral Request==
==Referral Request==
Rob Horn is likely to be editor... will confirm by November.
Rob Horn is likely to be editor... will confirm by November.
Add that PCC has a keen interest in this proposal.  Suggest we update the template to add a section on interaction with other domains.
Open issues:  Planning Committee decisions required.  After TC Review, will transmit discussion to PC for any additional resolution.
==Sharing Value Sets==
Profile proposal is very long and detailed.  Suggest summarizing at a higher level.  Use cass should be written as a health care storyboard.
ITI Tech can't undertake 7 new transactions... suggest 2 or 3 for year 1 work.
Simplify transactions (down to 2) and describe actors at PC level.
Scott (Mayo) has parallel work being undertaken over the next couple of years.
==Extended PDQ Detailed Profile Proposal==
==Cross-Enterprise Service Bus (XSB)==
==ECON Query Profile==
White Papers
==Cross-Community Architecture White Paper==
==Terminology Sharing White Paper==

Revision as of 11:45, 26 October 2007

ITI Planning Committee - Minutes 26Oct07

Purpose - to review detailed profile and white paper proposals in preparation for submission to ITI Technical Committee.

Asynch XDS.B

Roberto will ensure another editor from Microsoft is assigned. The Wiki page will be updated. Use Case #1 - Roberto will strenthen this scenario and move it lower in the document, as it is lower priority. Scenario 2, 3 & 4 are most compelling. Scenario 3, change to "slow archive".

Add that this profile WILL apply to XCA transactions (describe in technical approach).

How about XDR - add to open issues? Technical Committee to review.

Referral Request

Rob Horn is likely to be editor... will confirm by November.

Add that PCC has a keen interest in this proposal. Suggest we update the template to add a section on interaction with other domains.

Open issues: Planning Committee decisions required. After TC Review, will transmit discussion to PC for any additional resolution.

Sharing Value Sets

Profile proposal is very long and detailed. Suggest summarizing at a higher level. Use cass should be written as a health care storyboard.

ITI Tech can't undertake 7 new transactions... suggest 2 or 3 for year 1 work.

Simplify transactions (down to 2) and describe actors at PC level.

Scott (Mayo) has parallel work being undertaken over the next couple of years.

Extended PDQ Detailed Profile Proposal

Cross-Enterprise Service Bus (XSB)

ECON Query Profile

White Papers

Cross-Community Architecture White Paper

Terminology Sharing White Paper