Talk:APW-EDM White Paper: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older editNewer edit →
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:




===Discussion: Use Case #1: Image Slides for Secondary Review / Consultation===
==Discussion: Use Case #1: Image Slides for Secondary Review / Consultation==


NOTE FROM NCJ: Hopefully between the contexts listed above, the consultation contexts ppt & discussion in the teleconference, and future discussion, we can all get to the same page on why these contexts have significant differences in workflow. The big question to me is do we want to make 1 big decision tree profile for all consultation, different trees for different contexts, or do the other authors have other suggestions? I must note that this is a big area where there is a gap in functionality for many vendor products, because these nuances have not been explained in white paper form previously. So while we might recoil from the complexity here, I think this is a key area of value of the white paper, but I am open to constructive criticism here. [[User:Thatwsiguy|-Nicholas C. Jones]] ([[User talk:Thatwsiguy|talk]]) 15:12, 13 March 2018 (CDT)


===Discussion: Use Case #2: Immunohistochemistry Positive Control Slides===
==Discussion: Use Case #2: Immunohistochemistry Positive Control Slides==




===Discussion: Use Case #3: Managing Digital Assets for Anatomic Pathology Clinical Workflows===
==Discussion: Use Case #3: Managing Digital Assets for Anatomic Pathology Clinical Workflows==




===Discussion: Use Case #4: Sharing and Cooperating on Gross Examination Images===
==Discussion: Use Case #4: Sharing and Cooperating on Gross Examination Images==




===Discussion: Use Case #5: Incorporation of Legacy Digital Images for Use in APW===
==Discussion: Use Case #5: Incorporation of Legacy Digital Images for Use in APW==




===Discussion: Use Case #6: Image Analysis, Machine Learning and In Silico Workflows===
==Discussion: Use Case #6: Image Analysis, Machine Learning and In Silico Workflows==




===Discussion: Use Case #7: Quality Control / Quality Assurance and Error Correction Workflows to Support Digital Pathology===
==Discussion: Use Case #7: Quality Control / Quality Assurance and Error Correction Workflows to Support Digital Pathology==




===Discussion: Use Case #8: Digital Pathology in Support of Clinical Conferences===
==Discussion: Use Case #8: Digital Pathology in Support of Clinical Conferences==




===Discussion: Use Case #9: Sub-contracting for special analyses on specimens===
==Discussion: Use Case #9: Sub-contracting for special analyses on specimens==




===Discussion: Use Case #10: Image Registration Functions===
==Discussion: Use Case #10: Image Registration Functions==




===Discussion: Use Case #11: Digital Pathology in Support of Intraoperative Procedures===
==Discussion: Use Case #11: Digital Pathology in Support of Intraoperative Procedures==

Revision as of 15:12, 13 March 2018

Discussion Page for APW-EDM White Paper



Discussion: Use Case #1: Image Slides for Secondary Review / Consultation

NOTE FROM NCJ: Hopefully between the contexts listed above, the consultation contexts ppt & discussion in the teleconference, and future discussion, we can all get to the same page on why these contexts have significant differences in workflow. The big question to me is do we want to make 1 big decision tree profile for all consultation, different trees for different contexts, or do the other authors have other suggestions? I must note that this is a big area where there is a gap in functionality for many vendor products, because these nuances have not been explained in white paper form previously. So while we might recoil from the complexity here, I think this is a key area of value of the white paper, but I am open to constructive criticism here. -Nicholas C. Jones (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2018 (CDT)

Discussion: Use Case #2: Immunohistochemistry Positive Control Slides

Discussion: Use Case #3: Managing Digital Assets for Anatomic Pathology Clinical Workflows

Discussion: Use Case #4: Sharing and Cooperating on Gross Examination Images

Discussion: Use Case #5: Incorporation of Legacy Digital Images for Use in APW

Discussion: Use Case #6: Image Analysis, Machine Learning and In Silico Workflows

Discussion: Use Case #7: Quality Control / Quality Assurance and Error Correction Workflows to Support Digital Pathology

Discussion: Use Case #8: Digital Pathology in Support of Clinical Conferences

Discussion: Use Case #9: Sub-contracting for special analyses on specimens

Discussion: Use Case #10: Image Registration Functions

Discussion: Use Case #11: Digital Pathology in Support of Intraoperative Procedures

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Talk:APW-EDM_White_Paper&oldid=107974"