Card Tech Minutes 2016.06.22: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:*Technical difficulties prevented the completion of the review. The comments from Siemens and Philips were finalized, and the Heartbase notes will take place at a later time. | :*Technical difficulties prevented the completion of the review. The comments from Siemens and Philips were finalized, and the Heartbase notes will take place at a later time. | ||
:''Tech Committee Discussion'' | :''Tech Committee Discussion'' | ||
:A variety of issues | :A variety of issues were presented regarding the structure of both committees. Concerns were raised about the overall strategy and engagement of front-line members of both committees and further | ||
: | |||
:'''Day 2, 22-Jun-2016''' | |||
:''General Discussion'' | |||
:Items regarding the overall progress of IHE project timelines and the benefits and risks of working together with the ACC. Misalignment of the ACC and IHE development cycles was acknowledged, with an eye for possibly adjusting to allow for participation in Connecathons, North American [Jan] or possibly the European [Apr]. | |||
:''RSC-C v5.0 Updates'' | |||
: | |||
Revision as of 08:35, 22 June 2016
- Day 1, 21-Jun-2016
- Structural Heart Public Comment Review
- Siemens and Philips submitted comments to the separate Google group for documentation of notes. Heartbase sent their comments directly to Charles Thomas. We will attempt to post more of these types of documents on the IHE FTP. Various comments were addressed and resolved during this time slot, with extensive notes made on the draft document and within the Excel spreadsheet to track the disposition of each comment.
- Technical difficulties prevented the completion of the review. The comments from Siemens and Philips were finalized, and the Heartbase notes will take place at a later time.
- Tech Committee Discussion
- A variety of issues were presented regarding the structure of both committees. Concerns were raised about the overall strategy and engagement of front-line members of both committees and further
- Day 2, 22-Jun-2016
- General Discussion
- Items regarding the overall progress of IHE project timelines and the benefits and risks of working together with the ACC. Misalignment of the ACC and IHE development cycles was acknowledged, with an eye for possibly adjusting to allow for participation in Connecathons, North American [Jan] or possibly the European [Apr].
- RSC-C v5.0 Updates