Difference between revisions of "Evaluation of Invoke Image Display"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? | * Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? | ||
− | There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API. | + | There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API. This CP might be related to security. Need to review. |
See [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TmSwnn4AIiXqFLc_AtzP0dNd9LUWnA-ZcCjBMKpLzp4/edit#gid=0 CP Tracking Spreadsheet] | See [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1TmSwnn4AIiXqFLc_AtzP0dNd9LUWnA-ZcCjBMKpLzp4/edit#gid=0 CP Tracking Spreadsheet] |
Revision as of 09:59, 4 May 2016
Profile wiki page: Invoke Image Display
Technical Committee Evaluation (Preliminary answers)
Answers to the following checklist for IID
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
There is one outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349) that suggests adding "close" and "logout" commands in the API. This CP might be related to security. Need to review.
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
Yes
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
Yes. Need to review the newly submitted CP from Marco.
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
Yes
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
Yes
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
Informal feedback gathering only
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
Yes.
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and debate conclusion
Planning Committee Consensus (Preliminary answers)
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
Yes. Tested in Bochum 2016, NA 2016, NA 2015, Vienna 2014
Connectathon test results summary
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
Yes.
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
Yes.
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
No option defined.
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
No.
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
Yes. HTTP(S) URL is widely used.
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
Yes.
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
One outstanding CP (CP-RAD-349)
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
David has already created one Invoke Image Display
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes