Difference between revisions of "DBT FT Evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Technical Committe Checklist == | == Technical Committe Checklist == | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | * Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"? | |
| − | + | * Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"? | |
| − | + | * Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected? | |
| − | + | * Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed? | |
| − | + | * Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with? | |
| − | + | * Gather feedback from implementers via a [ftp://ftp.ihe.net/Connectathon/IHE%20Vendor%20Questionnaire%20V0.4.doc formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants] | |
| − | + | * Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | |
* Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion) | * Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion) | ||
* Record checklist findings and debate conclusion | * Record checklist findings and debate conclusion | ||
Revision as of 05:23, 4 May 2016
Proposal
The Digital Breast Tomosynthesis profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Antje Schroeder)
Technical Committe Checklist
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- Gather feedback from implementers via a formal questionnaire to Connectathon participants
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and debate conclusion
Consensus
The Planning Committee votes on the Tech Cmte proposal to Final Text the supplement.
- Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
- Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
- It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting
- Run down the following checklist for each proposed supplement
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile
- Debate checklist exceptions (failure of any of the above is cause for discussion)
- Record checklist findings and conclusions of the debate in your meeting minutes
- Hold and record formal vote
- Communicate results to TC