PCCTech Minutes 2015 07 23: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ejones (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ejones (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


RECON:  
RECON:  
Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
*Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
On Phone: Tone Southerland
*On Phone: Tone Southerland
* updated the security considerations and the audit events.  
* updated the security considerations and the audit events.  
* clean up of the transaction numbering
* clean up of the transaction numbering
Line 24: Line 24:


BPMN
BPMN
Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
*Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
On Phone: Tone Southerland
*On Phone: Tone Southerland


* Updates made to white paper.
* Updates made to white paper.

Revision as of 10:45, 23 July 2015

Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot On Phone: Dragon, Didi Davis, Gayathri Jayawardena, Glen Marshall, Joyce Sensmeier, Tone Southerland

DAF

  • Voting today to move forward with IHE publication schedule and address any synergies and change proposals in late fall
  • IHE profiles test individual profiles - DAF is a bundle of profiles. Goal is to move in a new direction for testing the bundling
  • Dragon - looked at CareEquality - need to make sure the DAF IG (especially transactions) do not preclude anything that CareEquality is doing. This will take a day or two. This may result in minor corrections.
  • Tone suggests include as an open issue in the document that there may be CPs and additional changes may be needed.
  • Joyce agrees that the industry need to be made aware - suggest doing a blog post. Have reached out to Marianne.
  • Steve question - how will vendors claim conformance to DAF? What are we telling vendors to document so that they can claim conformance to DAF?
    • Joyce will take action to continue discussion to answer Steve's question.
  • IHE USA will schedule publication of DAF IG date with Mary Jungers for the end of August
  • DAF group and IHE USA members will meet with CareEquality Query work group on Monday August 3 at 1pm CST
  • Dragon will make updates with referencing the CareEquality piece.
  • Charles will be doing review on appendix B - and will provide suggested changes to Dragon before publication. Goal is for CareEquality to reference DAF appendix B. Will later have a CP on metadata - IHE, CareEquality.
  • VOte called for DAF IG to move to publication - Vote passed.

RECON:

  • Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
  • On Phone: Tone Southerland
  • updated the security considerations and the audit events.
  • clean up of the transaction numbering
  • Vote to move the profile forward to Trial implementation. Vote passed

BPMN

  • Attendees: George Cole, Steve Moore, Thom Kuhn, Sarah Willis, Celina Roth, Emma Jones, Charles Perisot
  • On Phone: Tone Southerland
  • Updates made to white paper.