PCCTech Minutes 2013 04 28: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "==Monday 2015 04 27 thru Thursday 04 30== ==Tuesday April 27, 2015== ==Attendees== In Person: Anne Diamond, Steve Moore, Mike Bohls, Emma Jones, George Cole, Denise Downing, Tone..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Tuesday April 28, 2015== | |||
==Tuesday April | |||
==Attendees== | ==Attendees== | ||
In Person: Anne Diamond, Steve Moore, Mike Bohls, Emma Jones, George Cole, Denise Downing, Tone Southerland, Keith Boone | In Person: Anne Diamond, Steve Moore, Mike Bohls, Emma Jones, George Cole, Denise Downing, Tone Southerland, Keith Boone | ||
On Phone:Brian Reinhold, Pieter Devolder | On Phone:Brian Reinhold, Pieter Devolder, Kevin McDermott | ||
==GAO== | |||
*Question from Pieter about use case from Belgium - answer provided | |||
*Keith presented changes to profile | |||
**Naming the order - review vs authorize - leaving as open issue for comment | |||
**Decision Support Service - tweaked the definition. Will need a CP for the TF to add the updated definition (won't need to change the indiv profiles) | |||
**Out of Scope - when the same authorization is provided to multiple entities for the same service | |||
==RPM== | |||
*Brian presented changes to the profile | |||
**Updated device observation consumer per input yesterday | |||
**Device observation reporter updated | |||
**Suggestion to use the PCC-1 transaction rather than having section 3.ZA Share Content Transaction - suggest putting the description in process flow section (volume 1). Can update the transaction table in volume 2 | |||
**Discussion about the need for the device observation source, reporter and content creator grouping as current diagram. Suggest an alternative diagram | |||
==CP Process== | |||
* Need to initiate the new CP process for managing CPs (based on DCC guidelines - it includes a google spreadsheet) - Denise will review and update | |||
* Need to follow the current CP ballot process for 2015 completed CPs - allow 30 days to complete voting? Need to confirm timeframe with Nancy. | |||
**If ballot completed by June 15, Steve will do the editorial work | |||
Revision as of 12:19, 28 April 2015
Tuesday April 28, 2015
Attendees
In Person: Anne Diamond, Steve Moore, Mike Bohls, Emma Jones, George Cole, Denise Downing, Tone Southerland, Keith Boone
On Phone:Brian Reinhold, Pieter Devolder, Kevin McDermott
GAO
- Question from Pieter about use case from Belgium - answer provided
- Keith presented changes to profile
- Naming the order - review vs authorize - leaving as open issue for comment
- Decision Support Service - tweaked the definition. Will need a CP for the TF to add the updated definition (won't need to change the indiv profiles)
- Out of Scope - when the same authorization is provided to multiple entities for the same service
RPM
- Brian presented changes to the profile
- Updated device observation consumer per input yesterday
- Device observation reporter updated
- Suggestion to use the PCC-1 transaction rather than having section 3.ZA Share Content Transaction - suggest putting the description in process flow section (volume 1). Can update the transaction table in volume 2
- Discussion about the need for the device observation source, reporter and content creator grouping as current diagram. Suggest an alternative diagram
CP Process
- Need to initiate the new CP process for managing CPs (based on DCC guidelines - it includes a google spreadsheet) - Denise will review and update
- Need to follow the current CP ballot process for 2015 completed CPs - allow 30 days to complete voting? Need to confirm timeframe with Nancy.
- If ballot completed by June 15, Steve will do the editorial work