Lab Conf Minutes 14October2014: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "Back to ''' IHE Laboratory Domain''' Back to ''' IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page'''" |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Back to '''[[Laboratory_Technical_Committee | IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page]]''' | Back to '''[[Laboratory_Technical_Committee | IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page]]''' | ||
==Attendees== | |||
==Minutes== | |||
<b>Agenda Review</b> | |||
<b>LAW Updates:</b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Ed will do clean-up for the 3-completed</li> | |||
<li>Ed will update the draft CP from the 2-completed</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<b>Profile CP:</b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Create examples for each of the LAB-message types to flesh;</li> | |||
<li>Message profile is represented in XML as the schema in Gazelle – pre-coordinated list would be easier for them;</li> | |||
<li>LAB-28 = OML one message profile without further option;</li> | |||
<li>Response message – LAB-28 and LAB-response = ORL;</li> | |||
<li>We don’t want to create repeating MSH-21, then we need to create LAB-18-Response;</li> | |||
<li>OBX-4 for micro – need in LAB-28 – need to consider; and</li> | |||
<li>LabMassSpec – need in LAB-28 and LAB-29</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<b>Handling optionality:</b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Reflex and re-runs;</li> | |||
<li>Patient demographic support;</li> | |||
<li>Type of testing vs ability to handle additional information;</li> | |||
<li>Potentially use MSH-21 as the main schema identifier;</li> | |||
<li>Same schema applies to all query types – but use the MSH-21 to identify, so that you could do a look up against all the declared profiles;</li> | |||
<li>May need to create a few combinations, that cover all the mixed and match;</li> | |||
<li>For reflex and re-run – those are options of testing scenario of the profile as there is no difference in the message structure; Same may apply to support for images as well;</li> | |||
<li><b>ACTION</b>: Ed and Riki to build examples for all options and then decide the profiles to list</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<b>LCC status update:</b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Wiki page was updated in July – the next step is writing the Change Proposals for HL7 – will get back to that in December 2014 – will be for 2.10 – publication for comment then late spring / summer 2015</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
<b>Other housekeeping items :</b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Change proposal processing on Lab TF – have received Dmytro CP for LDA profile and have a number of CPs that have been completed – need authors for next release in 2015</li> | |||
<li>New profile for connecting LAS? – part of the LDA (Impecco and Abbot)</li> | |||
</ul> | |||
==Next Meeting== | |||
<b>Face to Face Meeting: </b> | |||
<ul> | |||
<li>Next meeting is F2F will be at Deerfield CAP offices November 10-12 – google groups has listing of hotels etc – will we set up webex and teleconference for that – assume yes for now!;</li> | |||
<li>We are meeting joint with AP – Mary and Carolyn to coordinate agenda topics for overlapping;</li> | |||
<li>2 hour shared session for AP during lab meeting – LDA at least; and</li> | |||
<li>Working through agenda for F2F</li> | |||
Revision as of 11:26, 24 October 2014
Back to IHE Laboratory Domain
Back to IHE Laboratory Technical Committee Page
Attendees
Minutes
Agenda Review
LAW Updates:
- Ed will do clean-up for the 3-completed
- Ed will update the draft CP from the 2-completed
Profile CP:
- Create examples for each of the LAB-message types to flesh;
- Message profile is represented in XML as the schema in Gazelle – pre-coordinated list would be easier for them;
- LAB-28 = OML one message profile without further option;
- Response message – LAB-28 and LAB-response = ORL;
- We don’t want to create repeating MSH-21, then we need to create LAB-18-Response;
- OBX-4 for micro – need in LAB-28 – need to consider; and
- LabMassSpec – need in LAB-28 and LAB-29
Handling optionality:
- Reflex and re-runs;
- Patient demographic support;
- Type of testing vs ability to handle additional information;
- Potentially use MSH-21 as the main schema identifier;
- Same schema applies to all query types – but use the MSH-21 to identify, so that you could do a look up against all the declared profiles;
- May need to create a few combinations, that cover all the mixed and match;
- For reflex and re-run – those are options of testing scenario of the profile as there is no difference in the message structure; Same may apply to support for images as well;
- ACTION: Ed and Riki to build examples for all options and then decide the profiles to list
LCC status update:
- Wiki page was updated in July – the next step is writing the Change Proposals for HL7 – will get back to that in December 2014 – will be for 2.10 – publication for comment then late spring / summer 2015
Other housekeeping items :
- Change proposal processing on Lab TF – have received Dmytro CP for LDA profile and have a number of CPs that have been completed – need authors for next release in 2015
- New profile for connecting LAS? – part of the LDA (Impecco and Abbot)
Next Meeting
Face to Face Meeting:
- Next meeting is F2F will be at Deerfield CAP offices November 10-12 – google groups has listing of hotels etc – will we set up webex and teleconference for that – assume yes for now!;
- We are meeting joint with AP – Mary and Carolyn to coordinate agenda topics for overlapping;
- 2 hour shared session for AP during lab meeting – LDA at least; and
- Working through agenda for F2F