PCCPlan Minutes 2013 10 09: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
LHeermann (talk | contribs)
Line 31: Line 31:
===Patient Visit View Summary===
===Patient Visit View Summary===
* George Cole
* George Cole
** Review of Profile Proposal
** Discussion:
*** use of section headers, section titles to allow for different phrasing to be used for patients and providers
*** scoping - inclusion of rendering content?  At this point encouraged to include for further discussion at the Technical committee.

Revision as of 11:18, 9 October 2013

Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Charles Rica, Bruno Grossin, Denise Downing, Anne Diamond, Keith Boone

Call in Attendees: Emma Jones, George Cole, Dave Stumpf, Lisa Nelson,


Reconciliation of Interventions, Goals and Care Providers

  • Emma Jones
  • Discussion:

What do we mean by "intervention"? Need to define this in the detailed proposal.

Should we consider other things that need reconciliation? -

    • 1. Advance directives
    • 2. Providers and Pharmacy
    • 3. Family members and Contacts
    • 4. Patient preferences
    • 5. Coded Functional Status
    • 6. Medical Devices (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 7. Review of Systems
    • 8. Discharge Instructions (hospital) (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 9. Instructions Section (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 10. Discharge Diagnosis
    • 11. Hospital Discharge Results Summary
    • 12. Diet and Nutrition (would this go in the "intervention"?)
    • 13. Social History?

Some things have privacy and security risks.

Reconciling Vitals and Results as another profile is discouraged because results is done by other means and vitals are typically collected and utilized locally - this was discussed as part of the SMART project (Per George C.)

Patient Visit View Summary

  • George Cole
    • Review of Profile Proposal
    • Discussion:
      • use of section headers, section titles to allow for different phrasing to be used for patients and providers
      • scoping - inclusion of rendering content? At this point encouraged to include for further discussion at the Technical committee.