Difference between revisions of "XCA-I FT Evaluation"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
:: <font color="blue"> (Check with Lynn) </font> | :: <font color="blue"> (Check with Lynn) </font> | ||
* Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile? | * Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile? | ||
− | :: <font color="blue"> ( | + | :: <font color="blue"> (Discuss with Lynn) </font> |
* Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT? | * Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT? | ||
:: Yes. (ITI XCA, XDS-I.b, <font color="blue"> </font>) | :: Yes. (ITI XCA, XDS-I.b, <font color="blue"> </font>) |
Revision as of 10:31, 29 May 2013
XCA-I - Cross-Community_Access_for_Imaging has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Chris Lindop)
Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.
TC Checklist
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Yes. Open CPs:
- 223 - Consistent SOAP definitions for XCA-I transactions.
- This CP will be pre-requisite for final text. Will go out in the 2013 ballot pack.
- 234 - erroneously claims to add CDA option to XCA-I. This will not be done.
- 223 - Consistent SOAP definitions for XCA-I transactions.
- Yes. Open CPs:
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Yes
- ITI 650 OASIS/ebXML Registry Information Model constraint or IHE ITI TF Example change
- Yes
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- Yes.
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- Limited number of Initiating Gateways supporting Async. Async option has been lightly tested as Connectathon. We are depending upon vendor testing.
- Async is not the primary mode of operation. Vendors who have tested, do have experince testing async capabilities in other profiles.
- No tooling specific for XCA-I or XDS-I.b. Tools do exist for XDS.b and XCA.
- T&T intends to deliver XDS-I.b tools in 2013.
- Interoperability testing of XDS-I.b and XCA-I has been preformed in terms of successful transfer/display. However it is possible/likely these implementations may not fully comply with the technical framework specification (why tooling is needed)
- There may be implementation gaps but there is no reason to suspect issues with the specification.
- Limited number of Initiating Gateways supporting Async. Async option has been lightly tested as Connectathon. We are depending upon vendor testing.
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Yes. No other issues than
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- One open issue will be closed pending homework
TC Conclusion
- Technical Committee reccomends promotion to Final Text
PC Checklist
- Put Final Text Decision on the planning committee agenda
- Consider doing this a couple months before new TF version will be released so it can be incorporated.
- It's helpful to assign an advocate for the supplement at this time to check/prepare the evidence for the upcoming checklist rather than go hunting for it during the meeting
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- Yes. NA (2012, 2013) EU (2012, 2013)
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes. NA (2012, 2013) EU (2012, 2013)
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Yes. (9 vendors have tested various actors)
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- (Check with Lynn)
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- (Discuss with Lynn)
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- Yes. (ITI XCA, XDS-I.b, )
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Yes. 6 Products listed in Product Registry.
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- (Discuss)
Open Item: 1. Can a non-DICOM-wrapped JPEG be transferred “WADO-like” through a proxy? (Cross-Gateway Imaging Document Set Retrieve)
A WADO-like transport is not part of the specification for this profile.
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile