Difference between revisions of "PCCTech Minutes 2013 03 21"

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
  
  
===Integreation Statements===
+
===Integration Statements===
 
* Every Profile author needs to write an Integration STatement for their profile.  
 
* Every Profile author needs to write an Integration STatement for their profile.  
 
* Examples can be found at:  http://product-registry.ihe.net/PR/pr/search.seam?date=ANY|1363854853176|1363854853176
 
* Examples can be found at:  http://product-registry.ihe.net/PR/pr/search.seam?date=ANY|1363854853176|1363854853176
Line 32: Line 32:
 
* From the clinical side of the house there are significant differences between orders and referrals.  Also there are completely different uses between a consult type referral and a complete transfer of care type referral.   
 
* From the clinical side of the house there are significant differences between orders and referrals.  Also there are completely different uses between a consult type referral and a complete transfer of care type referral.   
 
* Decision made to keep to the original plan of this profile to be an independent profile and not an extension of the eReferral Profile.  Team agrees there are enough differences between the different intents and uses that they need to stay separate.
 
* Decision made to keep to the original plan of this profile to be an independent profile and not an extension of the eReferral Profile.  Team agrees there are enough differences between the different intents and uses that they need to stay separate.
 +
 +
===REcap/Next Steps cCDA Harmonization===

Revision as of 04:06, 21 March 2013

Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Vincent Van Pelt, Thom Kuhn, Anna Orlova, Valentina Ferrarini, Keith Boone, Lisa Nelson, George Cole, Charles Rica, Celina Roth

Call in attendees:


Integration Statements

  • Every Profile author needs to write an Integration STatement for their profile.
  • Examples can be found at: http://product-registry.ihe.net/PR/pr/search.seam?date=ANY%7C1363854853176%7C1363854853176
  • Note from Steve Moore with directions:
      • Now that spring is here, I am waking up from my winter hibernation. I'm sorry I could not join you in Italy, but I would ask each of the supplement authors to subject their profile to the Integration Statement Sniff Test (ISST).
      • That is, for likely systems that a vendor would want to offer to a customer, can you write the Integration Statement that describes what IHE actor/profile pairs are supported by that system?
        • - If you cannot write that Integration Statement, or if you write it and your fellow committee members do not understand it, you have failed the ISST.
        • - If you write it and think a knuckle-dragging RFP writer would not be able to understand it, you have failed the ISST.

Regards,

Steve Moore


=Recap/Next Steps Referral and Order Matching

Led by George Cole

  • have questions about the 3rd use case (EHDI) may not be upd to date
  • Lisa will get the updates/changes to George
  • Some uncertainties regarding what is needed in volume 2 for PCC. Guidance provided to the author.
  • Current copy of the profile is on the ftp site.

Recap/Next Steps Diagnostic Study Request

Led by Vincent Van Pelt

  • Continue to have questions regarding if this profile should be on its own or blended/extended from the eReferral. Vincent and Jurgen are wondering if there are differences in the countries on how it is managed that affects this decision.
  • From the clinical side of the house there are significant differences between orders and referrals. Also there are completely different uses between a consult type referral and a complete transfer of care type referral.
  • Decision made to keep to the original plan of this profile to be an independent profile and not an extension of the eReferral Profile. Team agrees there are enough differences between the different intents and uses that they need to stay separate.

REcap/Next Steps cCDA Harmonization