PCCTech Minutes 2012 12 04: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
**Concern expressed that a white paper does not meet the needs of the industry. The industry would benefit from IHE undertaking a profile development and contributing to the development of the standard(s). | **Concern expressed that a white paper does not meet the needs of the industry. The industry would benefit from IHE undertaking a profile development and contributing to the development of the standard(s). | ||
===CCDA Harmonization (including IC work) | ===CCDA Harmonization (including IC work)=== | ||
* Keith Boone | * Keith Boone | ||
** | ** | ||
Revision as of 13:47, 4 December 2012
Attendees: Laura Heermann Langford, Laura Bright, Emma Jones, George Cole, Anne Diamond, Lisa Nelson, Denise Downing, Tone Southerand, Keith Boone, Charles Rica, Thom Kuhn, Jon Farmer
Call in Attendees: Vincent Van Pelt, Robert Breas, Sri Bharadwaj, Chris Melo,
EHDI Workflow
- presented by Lisa Nelson
- concern expressed of the significant size of this workflow and the complexity of its dependency and need to coordinate with another profile being developed
BSR Workflow Definition
- Vincent van Pelt
- Scope clarified to have the profile give a generic way of managing and archiving all basic diagnostic and screening studies.
- The unique aspects of this profile that differentiates referral manager is the reporting that happens at the end. Referring a patient is different in that the expectation of what is received back after the patient is seen is different.
- Recommendation made for this project to start with eReferral and determine the similarities and differences. The work for this profile would then be determined if it is to be change proposal type work for eReferral or a new profile write.
- Quick review of eReferral indicates 3 tasks in eReferral but the inputs and outputs are almost the same as what is being proposed for Basic Study Request.
- The name "eReferral" would also be concerning as it may not always reflect the needs of the Basic Study Request.
- Recommended to also keep cross enterprise workflow in mind.
Care Plan
- Denise Downing, Emma Jones, Laura Heermann Langford, Jon Farmer
- Change the minimalist version to have syntactical, semantic and vocabulary interoperability.
- Concern expressed with the standards not being completely defined before undertaking this as a profile. Should this be a whitepaper instead?
- Concern expressed that a white paper does not meet the needs of the industry. The industry would benefit from IHE undertaking a profile development and contributing to the development of the standard(s).
CCDA Harmonization (including IC work)
- Keith Boone