IHERO UseCase 2011 FFF: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Cfield (talk | contribs)
Cfield (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:
==2. The Problem==
==2. The Problem==


''<Summarize the integration problem. What doesn’t work, or what needs to work.>''
Current patient QA solutions are not integrated well to the clinical workflow to enable efficient, fast and as automated daily patient QA as possible. The lack of integration causes a lot of manual work for clinicians, and thus does not encourage the adoption of these tools to be part of everyday operations and patient treatments in the clinic.
 


==3. Key Use Case==
==3. Key Use Case==

Revision as of 08:30, 20 March 2011


This template is for one or two page IHE workitem proposals for initial review.


<Delete everything in italics and angle brackets and replace with real text>


1. Proposed Workitem: Integrated Patient QA Checker (part of Patient Safety Use Case)

  • Proposal Editor: Name: Mika Miettinen, mika.miettinen@varian.com, +1 650 799 7665
  • Editor: Colin Field for Mika
  • Date: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
  • Version: N/A (Wiki keeps history)
  • Domain: Radiation Oncology

2. The Problem

Current patient QA solutions are not integrated well to the clinical workflow to enable efficient, fast and as automated daily patient QA as possible. The lack of integration causes a lot of manual work for clinicians, and thus does not encourage the adoption of these tools to be part of everyday operations and patient treatments in the clinic.

3. Key Use Case

<Describe a short use case scenario from the user perspective. The use case should demonstrate the integration/workflow problem.>

<Feel free to add a second use case scenario demonstrating how it “should” work. Try to indicate the people/systems, the tasks they are doing, the information they need, and hopefully where the information should come from.>


4. Standards & Systems

<List existing systems that are/could be involved in the problem/solution.>

<If known, list standards which might be relevant to the solution>


5. Discussion

<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>

<Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
<What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
<What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>


<This is the brief proposal. Try to keep it to 1 or at most 2 pages>