Difference between revisions of "Anatomic Pathology Structured Reports"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==1. Proposed Workitem: ''<initial working name for profile/whitepaper/etc>''== | ==1. Proposed Workitem: ''<initial working name for profile/whitepaper/etc>''== | ||
− | * Proposal Editor: | + | * Proposal Editor: Thomas Schrader, CHristel Daniel |
− | * Editor: | + | * Editor: Thomas Schrader? |
− | + | * Domain: Anatomic Pathology | |
− | |||
− | * Domain: | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==2. The Problem== | ==2. The Problem== |
Revision as of 19:21, 1 October 2008
1. Proposed Workitem: <initial working name for profile/whitepaper/etc>
- Proposal Editor: Thomas Schrader, CHristel Daniel
- Editor: Thomas Schrader?
- Domain: Anatomic Pathology
2. The Problem
<Summarize the integration problem. What doesn’t work, or what needs to work.>
3. Key Use Case
<Describe a short use case scenario from the user perspective. The use case should demonstrate the integration/workflow problem.>
<Feel free to add a second use case scenario demonstrating how it “should” work. Try to indicate the people/systems, the tasks they are doing, the information they need, and hopefully where the information should come from.>
4. Standards & Systems
<List existing systems that are/could be involved in the problem/solution.>
<If known, list standards which might be relevant to the solution>
5. Discussion
<Include additional discussion or consider a few details which might be useful for the detailed proposal>
- <Why IHE would be a good venue to solve the problem and what you think IHE should do to solve it.>
- <What might the IHE technical approach be? Existing Actors? New Transactions? Additional Profiles?>
- <What are some of the risks or open issues to be addressed?>
<This is the brief proposal. Try to keep it to 1 or at most 2 pages>