Rad Plan Minutes 2008-09-03: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 41: Line 41:
::* Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
::* Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
::* Medium-sized piece of work
::* Medium-sized piece of work
* Missing Brief Proposals
:* SWFII
::* Chris Lindop may assume that the updated profile has a slot
::* Chris Carr will solicit a proposal from him for review
:* Radiology Reporting
::* Chris Carr will
:* Mammography Rad-Tech Communication
::*
[[Radiology Planning Committee]]
[[Category: Minutes]]

Revision as of 11:13, 3 September 2008

Attendees

  • David Clunie
  • Kevin O'Donnell
  • John Paganini
  • Paul Seifert
  • Niki Wirsz
  • Joan
  • Nichole
  • Chris

Minutes

  • Add detailed dates to 2008-2009 development timeline
  • Action Item: Reissue call for Brief Profile Proposals with due date of Sept. 15
  • Reviewed Brief Profile Proposals submitted this far
  • Basic Image Review
  • Addresses demands for standardized baseline viewer by AMA, AANS, ACR, etc.
  • Dovetails with PDI to allow access to images for referring physicians
  • Profile would set baseline functional criteria and set some broad parameters for user interface
  • Physician groups may still persist in seeking development of a mandatory baseline viewer
  • Profile development challenge will be organizing participants and gaining satisfactory consensus (while avoiding "buttonology")
  • Goal is to have event to evaluate viewers at AANS meeting in April
  • Initial Small to medium proposal
  • David Clunie volunteers to help draft supplement
  • PDI Extensions
  • Expands PDI to address other kinds of media--removable USB media and DVD
  • Low to medium effort: may be set of CPs to PDI or new version of profile
  • XDS-I Using XDS.b Technology
  • Upgrading the technology for publishing and retrieving manifest to XDS.b
  • DICOM WG10 is now working on Web services-based transfer protocols to be published in 2009
  • Intent would be to replace the transfer protocol sections of profile when the new DICOM Web services become available
  • Question is whether security details ought to be included/referenced; eg, is XUA available for prime time
  • Medium to large piece of work; definitely a major profile
  • Enhanced DICOM Image
  • Enables interoperability of applications at a higher level; see 5 use cases defined
  • IHE might specify display behavior that makes use of the new objects
  • Important to get domain experts, including workstation vendors
  • Medium-sized piece of work
  • Missing Brief Proposals
  • SWFII
  • Chris Lindop may assume that the updated profile has a slot
  • Chris Carr will solicit a proposal from him for review
  • Radiology Reporting
  • Chris Carr will
  • Mammography Rad-Tech Communication

Radiology Planning Committee