Rad Tech Minutes 2026-02-02-06

Quick Links

• Daily Teams meeting details
  • Meeting Link
  • Meeting ID: 210 806 582 303 2
  • Meeting Passcode: kC9a673f
• Minutes for this meeting are here: https://wiki.ihe.net/index.php/Rad_Tech_Minutes_2026-02-02-06
• Working folder for IHE RAD Tech 2026 cycle: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XTCoCXrIUzlH0zg8zLFJcCqMoIoEWMvq?usp=sharing

• Manifest-Based Access to DICOM Objects (MADO) (Full 35%)
• Imaging Diagnostic Report (Phase II) - Proposal (Full 45%)

• IDR TI Implementation Guide (Phase I)

Participants

In Person

• Kevin O'Donnell
• Jason Nagels (TPM)
• Steve Nichols
• Wim Corbijn
• Yasunari "Salt" Shiokawa
• Harald Zachmann
• Antje Schroeder
• Jamie Dulkowski
• Chris Carr

Remote

• Charles Parisot
• Andrei Leontiev
• Andries Hamster
• David Kwan
• Griffin Fairchok
• Kinson Ho
• Mike Bohl
• Rick Busbridge
• Bas van den Heuvel
• Nick Hermans
• Ana Kostadinovska

Profile Name: MADO

• Did we line-by-line the entire document
• How ready is it to go out for TI: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
• How did the work fit in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
• Review the evaluation. Which complexity/uncertainty/effort points missed the mark?
• Or alternatively, estimate how many points you went over and assign the overage effort/complexity/uncertainty to the appropriate points.
• Are all the open issues closed?
• What significant debates in TI-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff or PC-Prep
• Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
• What residual risks are worth noting
• Does it feel we've met all the use cases
• Did the promised resources manifest
• What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
• Who should specifically be targeted for TI notification (implementors & advocates)
• When will we have sample data/objects
• Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
• Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the TI meeting, if not what was the gap
• Do you need any tcons between now and TI Publication

Profile Name: IDR

• Did we line-by-line the entire document
• How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm
• Which open issues are risky, and why
• Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them?
• Which use cases need more input
• Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved
• What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff
• Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved?
• Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution?
• Review the "effort points" in the evaluation. Still seems right? Need more?
• How does the scope feel in terms of being a useful chunk of work? (Needs more? Just right? More than enough?)
• How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
• Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
• Looking forward, if you had to reduce scope to hit TI, what would you drop

• Transactions.

• Have the promised resources manifested
• What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
• When will we have sample data/objects
• Who should specifically be targeted for Public Comment feedback

• Report Creators
• Academic Rads, Private Practice Rads

• Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the PC meeting (See "PC Prep Meeting" above), if not what was the gap

• Structurally complete-ish. Enough there to work on, but didn't circulate ahead of the meeting, Quite a few TODOs

• Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the PC meeting, if not what was the gap

• How many tcons would you like between now and PC Publication

• Three. We'll see how it goes.

• Do you need any tcons before TI Prep Meeting

• Schedule one. Can cancel.

Action Items

1. Include Retrospective discussion at TI meeting (April). Invite Aaron Goldmuntz to discussion.