PERF Evaluation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | *Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | ||
** ?? | ** ?? | ||
*Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed? | |||
** Yes | |||
== Technical Committee Consensus== | |||
:* It is proposed that the profile ... | |||
== Planning Committee Checklist == | |||
* Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions? | |||
:* No. North America only. | |||
* Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon? | |||
:* Yes. NA Connectathon 2014 | |||
* Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested? | |||
:* Modality: Hitachi, Philips | |||
:* Image Display: GE | |||
:* Image Manager: Karos, Dell, Tiani-Spirit | |||
* Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon? | |||
:*Profile does not define any options | |||
:*Evaluation of options | |||
::*N/A | |||
* Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile? | |||
:* No | |||
* Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT? | |||
:* | |||
* (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?) | |||
:* | |||
* Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved? | |||
::: | |||
* Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page [[Profiles|overview of the profile]] | |||
:* | |||
Revision as of 20:13, 2 April 2025
CT/MR Perfusion Imaging with Contrast (PERF) Final Text Evaluation
Reviewed by IHE RAD Tech on April 3, 2025:
Proposal
The CT/MR Perfusion Imaging with Contrast profile has been nominated for advancement to Final Text. (Advocate: Wim Corbijn) Per the Final Text Process, Items in blue text below warrant Committee discussion.
Technical Committee Checklist
Decision:
- Are all significant CPs against the profile "closed"?
- Currently no active CPs
- Are all significant CPs against the underlying standards "closed"?
- Currently no active CPs
- Have all significant comments been CP'd or rejected?
- No open comments identified
- Have all open issues listed in the Supplement been closed?
- No open issues, all issues are closed.
- Have all significant issues at Connectathon been dealt with?
- not aware of any issues left from the Connectathons.
- Gather feedback from implementers. Your domain secretary has access to the contact information for vendors that have tested your profile at previous Connectathons and can help coordinate reaching out.
- No further feedback identified. Latest testing done in 2014 and 2017 Connectathons.
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- ??
- Has the Connectathon Project Manager been queried and significant issues addressed?
- Yes
Technical Committee Consensus
- It is proposed that the profile ...
Planning Committee Checklist
- Has the profile been through a Connectathon in at least two regions?
- No. North America only.
- Has the profile been successfully tested with all actors at least at one Connectathon?
- Yes. NA Connectathon 2014
- Have different implementations of each actor in the profile been tested?
- Modality: Hitachi, Philips
- Image Display: GE
- Image Manager: Karos, Dell, Tiani-Spirit
- Have all the options been tested successfully at at least one Connectathon?
- Profile does not define any options
- Evaluation of options
- N/A
- Are there IHE-provided software testing tools to address all aspects of the profile?
- No
- Have the standards underlying the profile been implemented? In similar use cases? In healthcare? In general IT?
- (Do you have concrete reason to believe that this works robustly in the Real World) / (Are any products available for purchase that implement the profile?)
- Have all issues that may have been raised about the profile been resolved?
- Has there been sufficient interest in the profile to generate a one-page overview of the profile