POCUS PC Checkpoint Assessment: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Stevenichols (talk | contribs) |
Stevenichols (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Profile Name: EBIW POCUS Extensions | * Profile Name: EBIW POCUS Extensions | ||
* Did we line-by-line the entire document: '''No''' | * Did we line-by-line the entire document: '''No''' | ||
**Need to line-by-line | **'''Need to line-by-line''' | ||
***Vol1: 2 concepts (Billing, Intermittent Connected Modalities), 3 more use cases and Data model | ***'''Vol1: 2 concepts (Billing, Intermittent Connected Modalities), 3 more use cases and Data model''' | ||
***Vol2: RAD-132 | ***'''Vol2: RAD-132''' | ||
* How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm: Almost | * How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm: '''Almost''' | ||
* Which open issues are risky, and why | * Which open issues are risky, and why: '''Identification of training studies needs to be better vetted with ACEP''' | ||
* Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them? | * Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them? '''Yes''' | ||
* Which use cases need more input | * Which use cases need more input '''None''' | ||
* Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved | * Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved '''Need to finish line by line''' | ||
* What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff | * What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff | ||
**'''Revisiting whether or not to create a separate profile, and / or whether or not to create a "POCUS Encounter Manager"''' | |||
**'''Lots of time spent trying to get the Actor diagram into IHE format''' | |||
* Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved? | * Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved? | ||
* Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution? | * Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution? | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 30 January 2025
Annex: PC-Prep Closing Assessment
Paste the following checklist items into the minutes; discuss and record findings for each
- Profile Name: EBIW POCUS Extensions
- Did we line-by-line the entire document: No
- Need to line-by-line
- Vol1: 2 concepts (Billing, Intermittent Connected Modalities), 3 more use cases and Data model
- Vol2: RAD-132
- Need to line-by-line
- How ready is it to go out for PC: Completely, Almost, Soonish, Hmmm: Almost
- Which open issues are risky, and why: Identification of training studies needs to be better vetted with ACEP
- Are all open issues phrased to solicit the needed information to close them? Yes
- Which use cases need more input None
- Which issues from the Kickoff Closing Assessment are still unresolved Need to finish line by line
- What significant debates in PC-prep were not anticipated in the Kickoff
- Revisiting whether or not to create a separate profile, and / or whether or not to create a "POCUS Encounter Manager"
- Lots of time spent trying to get the Actor diagram into IHE format
- Review ALL "uncertainty points" in the evaluation. Are all now resolved?
- Review ALL "complexity points" in the evaluation. Did each get appropriate text coverage/resolution?
- Review the "effort points" in the evaluation. Still seems right? Need more?
- How does the scope feel in terms of being a useful chunk of work? (Needs more? Just right? More than enough?)
- How is the work fitting in the allocated bandwidth? (Time to spare? Just right? Things were left undone?)
- Did the Breakdown of Tasks accurately reflect the work? What extra tasks arose?
- Looking forward, if you had to reduce scope to hit TI, what would you drop
- Have the promised resources manifested
- What vendors are engaged (for each actor)
- When will we have sample data/objects
- Who should specifically be targeted for Public Comment feedback
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the start of the PC meeting (See "PC Prep Meeting" above), if not what was the gap
- Was the profile where it needed to be at the end of the PC meeting, if not what was the gap
- How many tcons would you like between now and PC Publication
- Do you need any tcons before TI Prep Meeting