Quality Roadmap: Difference between revisions
FEisenberg (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Scope and Current Work== | ==Scope and Current Work== | ||
There is ongoing work in several parts of the healthcare community today to incorporate quality guidelines into clinical workflow. To support and coordinate these efforts, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) have joined together to sponsor and launch the IHE Quality domain. Its mission is to address the infrastructure necessary to share information relevant to quality improvement in electronic patient care and health care records. | |||
===Profile Selection=== | ===Profile Selection=== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 14: | ||
These '''Detailed Profile Proposals''' were short-listed and evaluated by the Technical Committee | These '''Detailed Profile Proposals''' were short-listed and evaluated by the Technical Committee | ||
* | * | ||
These items were '''selected''' by the [[Committees| Planning Committee]] for this Cycle: | These items were '''selected''' by the [[Committees| Planning Committee]] for this Cycle: | ||
* TF Maintenance | * TF Maintenance | ||
==Timeline : 2007-2008 Development Cycle== | ==Timeline : 2007-2008 Development Cycle== | ||
| Line 92: | Line 90: | ||
; M : Essential Future | ; M : Essential Future | ||
; L : Nice to Have | ; L : Nice to Have | ||
==Roadmap== | ==Roadmap== | ||
Revision as of 18:32, 6 November 2007
Scope and Current Work
There is ongoing work in several parts of the healthcare community today to incorporate quality guidelines into clinical workflow. To support and coordinate these efforts, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) have joined together to sponsor and launch the IHE Quality domain. Its mission is to address the infrastructure necessary to share information relevant to quality improvement in electronic patient care and health care records.
Profile Selection
These Brief Profile Proposals were submitted for the 2006-2007 Development Cycle:
- Structured Quality Measure Validation and Aggregation
- Structured Quality Measure Definition and Import
- Receive & Forward Proxy Actor
- Proposed Work Item: Imaging Structured Reporting – Creation and Transmission
- Electronic Exchange of Patient Care Coordination Data Using the Omaha System; A Terminology That Supports Clinical Practice
These Detailed Profile Proposals were short-listed and evaluated by the Technical Committee
These items were selected by the Planning Committee for this Cycle:
- TF Maintenance
Timeline : 2007-2008 Development Cycle
Legend
| Timeframe | Activity | Scheduled | Location | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | ||||
| Nov. | Submit Brief Profile Proposals to Planning Committee (PC) | Nov 5 - Deadline | ||
| Nov. | PC Selects "Short List" of Profiles | Nov 6 10am | Face-to-Face | |
| Nov. | PC Selects Final Profiles | Dec 6 1400-1500 | Tcon | |
| 2008 | ||||
| Jan. | Update Technical Framework from 2007 | Jan 8-10 | Face-to-Face | |
| March. | Kick-off New Profile Development | March 10-13 | Face-to-Face | |
| May. | TC Prepares Supplements for Public Comments | May 19-23 | Face-to-Face | |
| June. | TC Publishes Technical Framework for Public Comment | June 9 | Tcon | |
| July. | TC Reviews Public Comment Feedback and Prepare Trial Implementation | July 21-25 | Face-to-Face | |
| 2009 | ||||
| Jan. | Test implementations at Connectathon | Chicago | ||
Priority:
Roadmap
|