Rad Joint Agenda 2016-11-29: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Terisippel (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
==Agenda==
==Agenda==


IHE Radiology Joint Planning and Technical Committee F2F Meeting at RSNA, McCormick Place
'''IHE Radiology Joint Planning and Technical Committee F2F Meeting at RSNA'''


Tuesday, November  
McCormick Place,  Room E271A
Tuesday, November 29th, 8:30am-10:30am CT


 
'''Agenda:'''
Webex link:


* Breakfast and Welcome
* Breakfast and Welcome
Line 24: Line 24:
* Current IHE Educational Courses Review
* Current IHE Educational Courses Review
* IHE Financial Sustainability Model and Participation - 2 years later
* IHE Financial Sustainability Model and Participation - 2 years later
* Scope of IHE Radiology Domain
** RAD Profiles have been deployed beyond radiology and used as imaging infrastructure in other Domains
** Should "Enterprise Imaging" be formally identified as in RAD Scope?  If No, where does it belong? If Yes, should RAD be renamed?
* Open Discussion
* Open Discussion



Latest revision as of 10:12, 5 December 2016

Agenda

IHE Radiology Joint Planning and Technical Committee F2F Meeting at RSNA

McCormick Place, Room E271A Tuesday, November 29th, 8:30am-10:30am CT

Agenda:

  • Breakfast and Welcome
    • Introductions - Co-Chairs
    • Introductions - Meeting Participants
  • IHE Radiology Profiles:
    • Overview
    • 2015-2016 Workitems Completed
    • 2016-2017 New Work Items
    • 2016-2017 Timelines
      • Development Kickoff Mtg Nov
      • Publish for Public Comment Prep Feb xx
      • Public Comment Resolution Apr xx
  • 2016-2017 Promotions
  • Current RSNA 2016 IHE events
  • Current IHE Educational Courses Review
  • IHE Financial Sustainability Model and Participation - 2 years later
  • Scope of IHE Radiology Domain
    • RAD Profiles have been deployed beyond radiology and used as imaging infrastructure in other Domains
    • Should "Enterprise Imaging" be formally identified as in RAD Scope? If No, where does it belong? If Yes, should RAD be renamed?
  • Open Discussion


Radiology Planning Committee