QRPH Tech Minutes 2015 02 23

Attendees

• Lisa Nelson
• Thierry Dart
• Julie Dumons
• Lara Tramontan
• Laura Bright
• Derek Ritz
• John Eichwald
• Bob Joliffe
• Amit Popat
• Patty Craig
• Eric Larson
• Lori Fourquet
• Xen Santas
• Didi Davis
• Michelle Williamson
• Jen Foltz
• Justin Fyffe
• Diana Warner, AHIMA
• Xidong Deng
• Eric Cahill, CDC
• Thomsun Kuhn
• Chris Carr
• Nichole Drye Mayo

Minutes

• Agenda Review
  • QME input
  • Bob - list of queries for Volume 1 and work on 2
  • Progressing HW profile updates and clean up issues on BFDR and VRDR
  • Useful research; are we moving in right direction w/ADX?
  • Making sure items that come out of IHE are applicable to international perspective
  • QME-EH use cases and actors/option; strategy for volume 3 and 4 for this profile
  • Resolve outstanding issues w/BFDR and VRDR; derivation rules; international engagement

• Aggregate Data Exchange (Bob Joliffe)
• Open Issues
  • ADX is being driven by requirements in lower resource areas.
  • Json or CSV?
  • Continue use cases this afternoon.

• Change Proposals
  • Discuss change proposal versioning especially after final text - Amit, QRPH Co-chairs and DCC
  • PRPH-Ca - Eric will reach out to that team to get an update this week
  • VRDR - Lori Fourquet update and assigned 0082; have the CP and need to apply it to the document; wait until all changes and then roll in
  • EHDI 0083 - Lisa Nelson; not just content profile; has a content doc defined and a transaction in it; missing constraint in us realm template for procedure section; 2 errors in us and international realm; Section levels need to reference section not document; do we accept all changes and if so, how do we make them? Lunch work
    • Lisa motioned to approve changes.
    • John Eichwald seconded the motion.
    • 10 approve
    • 0 abstentions
    • 0 against

• Content Based Document Types (Lara Tramontan)
  • Open Issues
    • Define TTP
    • Typos and request to simplify language; LB will help LT

• Quality Measure Execution (QME)
• QME-EH quality measure that's been defined for hearing. What percent of children leave the hospital having had a hearing screening?

4 points - 1. Concept of processing a set of documents - a run. 2. Through questions received people have questions about whether or not documents to be processed are complete set of documents - not in scope to determine this. But there are mechanisms of dealing with it. one possibility mentioned. 3. Table of which content profiles does this profile address. 3 different kinds of quality reports listed. 4. Interplay between options and conditional content module.

• Talk with PCC about how they are solving the content named options issue.

• Healthy Weight (Lori Fourquet)
• Lori submitting a CP to PCC for height/weight changes, checking to see if we are consistently using the right LOINC codes.
• In HL7 message, Steve Rose says the financial information can be captured in the metric (a different payer); no difference in granularity levels represented. If true, should go back to HL7 and request it not be so granular.
• Volume 1 - what we do with appendices; use case re-write; resolution of what happens to the discreet data import; Internalizing the occupation health section

• ADX (Bob Joliffe)
  • Introduction to this supplement rewritten
  • Created open issues and questions
  • Using 4 different use cases; each use case want to indicate the type of data (examples) within use case and restrict use cases to determine types

• Wrap up/Homework
  • Bob will enhance use cases for a little more story; process, story and sequence diagram