QRPH Tech Minutes 2014-03-28: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 36: Line 36:
*CPs (5 minutes)
*CPs (5 minutes)
**Landen Bain presents a document that records discussion of the CP.  A recommendation to resolve the CP by separating the profile in two, an RPE1 and an RPE2, and to let them co-evolve for a year or two of co-evolution, before re-visiting the idea of bringing them back together.  The QRPH Tech Meeting in April will allow for a more thorough analysis of this approach.  Scott Moss, who submitted the CP, agrees with the approach.
**Landen Bain presents a document that records discussion of the CP.  A recommendation to resolve the CP by separating the profile in two, an RPE1 and an RPE2, and to let them co-evolve for a year or two of co-evolution, before re-visiting the idea of bringing them back together.  The QRPH Tech Meeting in April will allow for a more thorough analysis of this approach.  Scott Moss, who submitted the CP, agrees with the approach.


*[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=QRPH_Tech_Agenda_2014-04-28-05-02 April/May Face to Face Meeting Agenda Review] (Gokce - 5 minutes)
*[http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=QRPH_Tech_Agenda_2014-04-28-05-02 April/May Face to Face Meeting Agenda Review] (Gokce - 5 minutes)

Latest revision as of 11:11, 28 March 2014

  • Attendees
    • Gokce B. Laleci
    • Michelle Williamson
    • Didi Davis
    • Hector Cintron
    • LaShawn Edwards
    • John Eichwald
    • Terese Finitzo
    • Vijay Shah
    • Lisa Nelson
    • John Stamm
    • Rita Torkzadeh
    • Johanna Goderre
    • Landen Bain
    • Scott Moss
    • Eric Larson
    • Lori Fourquet
    • Xidong Deng
    • Jim Jellison
    • Lauren Lemieux
    • Nichole Drye-Mayo

Minutes

  • BFDRE interim - Michelle Williamson (15 minutes)
    • BFDRFeed - need new transaction ID


  • EHDI Final (30 minutes)


  • CPs (5 minutes)
    • Landen Bain presents a document that records discussion of the CP. A recommendation to resolve the CP by separating the profile in two, an RPE1 and an RPE2, and to let them co-evolve for a year or two of co-evolution, before re-visiting the idea of bringing them back together. The QRPH Tech Meeting in April will allow for a more thorough analysis of this approach. Scott Moss, who submitted the CP, agrees with the approach.