PCD Cochairs 2013-04-23 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Older edit
Efurst (talk | contribs)
editor
8,826 edits
m →Participants: update
PaulSherman (talk | contribs)
6,675 edits
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 53: Line 53:
: Agenda Accepted   
: Agenda Accepted   


'''Action(s):''' No new Action Items
'''Action(s):'''  


|-
|-
| align="center" | 2
| align="center" | 2
| '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair: Garguilo
| '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair: Garguilo
| '''Status/Discussion:''' Meeting notes reviewed
| '''Status/Discussion:'''  
: Deferred  '''Placeholder'''


'''Decisions/Issues:'''  
'''Decisions/Issues:'''  
: Meeting notes approved


'''Action(s):'''  
'''Action(s):'''  
Line 71: Line 71:
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''


:3. Spring F2F:  
PCD F2F:
:4. Profiles and TF Updates:
:- Action Items: They were discussed and will be on the agenda for the PC/TC tomorrow. Manny to place these into a spreadsheet to facilitate discussion.
:5. Standards Coordination:
::o Time zone: John Rhoads suggested that this be addressed everywhere time stamp is entered.
:6. IHE International:
::o Risk Management: John Rhoads noted that people won’t look to the ITI Security Cookbook for non-security risk management.
:7. AAMI:
::o Profile Error Codes: Should this be generalized? Rosetta terms/local tables? NIST test tools? PIV returns detailed error codes in the ACK; John Rhoads asked how these are related to alarms. Monroe asked if it is appropriate to pass events in these messages or if they should be in EC.
:- Presentations:
::o Use Cases Identified in the Tests: Discussion indicated the goal is desirable, but there are practical issues. Manny to consider the question.
:- AAMI Demonstration:
 
:8. Recruiting:
Other Items:
:9. Action Items (Last reviewed Jan. 22):
:- Nothing to report.
:10. Additional Business:


'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Decisions/Issues:'''


'''Action(s):'''
'''Action(s):'''
:- Manny to notify Todd, et al of the agenda and some have names and some need names of leaders.


|-
| align="center" | 4
| '''Other Business''' <br>- All
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
:
'''Decisions/Issues:'''
'''Action(s):'''




Line 110: Line 98:


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive 2013]]

Latest revision as of 11:42, 10 June 2014

Patient Care Device Cochairs Weekly Meeting

Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Time: 3:00 pm, Eastern Time

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

1. Review & Approve Agenda
2. Review Previous Meeting Summaries PCD_Cochairs_2013-04-02_Webex, PCD_Cochairs_2013-04-09_Webex
3. Action Items, Other Issues from Spring F2F
- F2F Agenda Items Not Addressed
4. Profiles and TF Updates
5. Standards Coordination
6. IHE International
7. AAMI
- Presentations
- AAMI Demonstration
8. Recruiting
9. Action Items (Last reviewed Jan. 22)
10. Additional Business

Attachments / Materials

See PCD Cochair Action Items page. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.

Meeting Summary

Participants

Cochairs: John Garguilo, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads
Guest: Ken Fuchs
Chair: John Garguilo
Technical Project Manager: Manny Furst

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair: Garguilo 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Agenda Accepted

Action(s):

2 Review Meeting Summaries
- Chair: Garguilo 		Status/Discussion:

Decisions/Issues:

Meeting notes approved

Action(s):


3 Agenda Items
- Chair: Garguilo 		Status/Discussion:

PCD F2F:

- Action Items: They were discussed and will be on the agenda for the PC/TC tomorrow. Manny to place these into a spreadsheet to facilitate discussion.
o Time zone: John Rhoads suggested that this be addressed everywhere time stamp is entered.
o Risk Management: John Rhoads noted that people won’t look to the ITI Security Cookbook for non-security risk management.
o Profile Error Codes: Should this be generalized? Rosetta terms/local tables? NIST test tools? PIV returns detailed error codes in the ACK; John Rhoads asked how these are related to alarms. Monroe asked if it is appropriate to pass events in these messages or if they should be in EC.
o Use Cases Identified in the Tests: Discussion indicated the goal is desirable, but there are practical issues. Manny to consider the question.

Other Items:

- Nothing to report.

Decisions/Issues:

Action(s):



Next Meeting

The next meeting will be April 30, 2013 PCD Cochairs 2013-04-30 Webex

<For Decision Meetings, add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">


PCD Home

Retrieved from "http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Cochairs_2013-04-23_Webex&oldid=77499"