PCD Cochairs 2013-04-23 Webex: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m →Proposed Agenda: remove placeholder designation |
PaulSherman (talk | contribs) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
=== Participants === | === Participants === | ||
: Cochairs: John Garguilo | : Cochairs: John Garguilo, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads | ||
: Guest: Ken Fuchs | : Guest: Ken Fuchs | ||
: Chair: John Garguilo | : Chair: John Garguilo | ||
: Technical Project Manager: Manny Furst | : Technical Project Manager: Manny Furst | ||
| Line 54: | Line 53: | ||
: Agenda Accepted | : Agenda Accepted | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 2 | | align="center" | 2 | ||
| '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair: Garguilo | | '''Review Meeting Summaries''' <br>- Chair: Garguilo | ||
| '''Status/Discussion: | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
: Meeting notes approved | |||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 72: | Line 71: | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
PCD F2F: | |||
: | :- Action Items: They were discussed and will be on the agenda for the PC/TC tomorrow. Manny to place these into a spreadsheet to facilitate discussion. | ||
: | ::o Time zone: John Rhoads suggested that this be addressed everywhere time stamp is entered. | ||
: | ::o Risk Management: John Rhoads noted that people won’t look to the ITI Security Cookbook for non-security risk management. | ||
: | ::o Profile Error Codes: Should this be generalized? Rosetta terms/local tables? NIST test tools? PIV returns detailed error codes in the ACK; John Rhoads asked how these are related to alarms. Monroe asked if it is appropriate to pass events in these messages or if they should be in EC. | ||
:- | ::o Use Cases Identified in the Tests: Discussion indicated the goal is desirable, but there are practical issues. Manny to consider the question. | ||
: | |||
: | Other Items: | ||
: | :- Nothing to report. | ||
: | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
'''Action(s):''' | '''Action(s):''' | ||
| Line 111: | Line 98: | ||
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | [[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]] | ||
[[Category:PCD Meeting]] | [[Category:PCD Meeting Archive 2013]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:42, 10 June 2014
Patient Care Device Cochairs Weekly Meeting
Date: Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Time: 3:00 pm, Eastern Time
Duration: 60 Minutes
Proposed Agenda
- 1. Review & Approve Agenda
- 2. Review Previous Meeting Summaries PCD_Cochairs_2013-04-02_Webex, PCD_Cochairs_2013-04-09_Webex
- 3. Action Items, Other Issues from Spring F2F
- - F2F Agenda Items Not Addressed
- 4. Profiles and TF Updates
- 5. Standards Coordination
- 6. IHE International
- 7. AAMI
- - Presentations
- - AAMI Demonstration
- 8. Recruiting
- 9. Action Items (Last reviewed Jan. 22)
- 10. Additional Business
Attachments / Materials
See PCD Cochair Action Items page. Significant changes, other than dates, will be in bold.
Meeting Summary
Participants
- Cochairs: John Garguilo, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads
- Guest: Ken Fuchs
- Chair: John Garguilo
- Technical Project Manager: Manny Furst
Discussion
Item Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair: GarguiloStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Agenda Accepted
Action(s):
2 Review Meeting Summaries
- Chair: GarguiloStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
- Meeting notes approved
Action(s):
3 Agenda Items
- Chair: GarguiloStatus/Discussion: PCD F2F:
- - Action Items: They were discussed and will be on the agenda for the PC/TC tomorrow. Manny to place these into a spreadsheet to facilitate discussion.
- o Time zone: John Rhoads suggested that this be addressed everywhere time stamp is entered.
- o Risk Management: John Rhoads noted that people won’t look to the ITI Security Cookbook for non-security risk management.
- o Profile Error Codes: Should this be generalized? Rosetta terms/local tables? NIST test tools? PIV returns detailed error codes in the ACK; John Rhoads asked how these are related to alarms. Monroe asked if it is appropriate to pass events in these messages or if they should be in EC.
- o Use Cases Identified in the Tests: Discussion indicated the goal is desirable, but there are practical issues. Manny to consider the question.
Other Items:
- - Nothing to report.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
Next Meeting
The next meeting will be April 30, 2013 PCD Cochairs 2013-04-30 Webex
<For Decision Meetings, add review line here when minutes are approved; e.g., "(Reviewed & approved by PCD RTM Vent TG 2008-04-16)">