PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2012-08-14 Webex: Difference between revisions
m establish page |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_WG_2012-13 | http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_WG_2012-13 | ||
'''This meeting was | '''This meeting was recorded ''' | ||
== Participants == | == Participants == | ||
Chris Courville, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Nitin Kunte, Richard Lane, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, John Zaleski, Manny Furst | |||
== Discussion == | == Discussion == | ||
| Line 41: | Line 39: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 2 | | align="center" | 2 | ||
| ''' | | '''2013 N A Connectathon''' <br>- Manny | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
ADT: | |||
Nitin expressed their need to assure that the ADT systems support them. Manny responded that PCD will need to specify ADT and other non-PCD system requirements for them and others. We will need to address this later in the registration cycle. | |||
RDQ: | |||
John Zaleski will develop a database and anticipates having a responding system. The database will be posted to the ftp site (folder defined). He anticipates a csv file. A significant question is how to query the database. The database should be available early in October. John asked John Garguilo if the NIST tool will be capable of responding to the query. John Garguilo agreed, suggesting that for this first round NIST would translate the .csv file to .xml. John G asked if the responder could be an administrative system similar to those in other domains. NIST hasn’t done a great deal with this, but it would be useful to look at this. John G indicated that early October is pushing the limit, and John Z offered to provide the table in mid-September. John G indicated that a query/response test will have more steps than the usual PCD profile test, especially when the NIST tool is the responding system. E.g., at the Connectathon how will we best verify that the system that obtains the data actually received the data. He recommended that inspection testing is the appropriate approach this first year. | |||
Other: | |||
Manny indicated links added to the Wiki page and noted that participants will need to check for updates on IHE Connectathon and HIMSS Showcase pages periodically. | |||
'''Decisions/Issues:''' | '''Decisions/Issues:''' | ||
| Line 50: | Line 57: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| align="center" | 3 | | align="center" | 3 | ||
| ''' | | '''2013 Showcase''' <br>- Manny | ||
| '''Status/Discussion:''' | | '''Status/Discussion:''' | ||
Latest revision as of 13:06, 21 August 2012
PCD Connectathon & Showcase Meeting 2012-2013 Cycle, August 14, 2012
Action Items
You can find the Action Items at PCD-Connectathon&Showcase-ActionItemsCycle7-2012-2013
Agenda
You can find the agenda at http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=PCD_Connectathon%26Showcase_WG_2012-13
This meeting was recorded
Participants
Chris Courville, Al Engelbert, Robert Flanders, John Garguilo, Nitin Kunte, Richard Lane, Monroe Pattillo, John Rhoads, John Zaleski, Manny Furst
Discussion
Item3 Topic Discussion 1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- MannyStatus/Discussion: - No changes were made to the agenda.
- Discussion Summary from last meetings were reviewed and approved PCD Connectathon&Showcase 2012-07-31 Webex
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
2 2013 N A Connectathon
- MannyStatus/Discussion: ADT: Nitin expressed their need to assure that the ADT systems support them. Manny responded that PCD will need to specify ADT and other non-PCD system requirements for them and others. We will need to address this later in the registration cycle.
RDQ: John Zaleski will develop a database and anticipates having a responding system. The database will be posted to the ftp site (folder defined). He anticipates a csv file. A significant question is how to query the database. The database should be available early in October. John asked John Garguilo if the NIST tool will be capable of responding to the query. John Garguilo agreed, suggesting that for this first round NIST would translate the .csv file to .xml. John G asked if the responder could be an administrative system similar to those in other domains. NIST hasn’t done a great deal with this, but it would be useful to look at this. John G indicated that early October is pushing the limit, and John Z offered to provide the table in mid-September. John G indicated that a query/response test will have more steps than the usual PCD profile test, especially when the NIST tool is the responding system. E.g., at the Connectathon how will we best verify that the system that obtains the data actually received the data. He recommended that inspection testing is the appropriate approach this first year.
Other: Manny indicated links added to the Wiki page and noted that participants will need to check for updates on IHE Connectathon and HIMSS Showcase pages periodically.
Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
3 2013 Showcase
- MannyStatus/Discussion: Decisions/Issues:
Action(s):
Return to main WG page which has links to individual meeting pages
Return to main PCD Connectathon/Showcase WG page: PCD_Connectathon&Showcase_WG_2012-13