Quality Roadmap: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Legend==
==Scope and Current Work==
{|
 
|'''Priority:'''
There is ongoing work in several parts of the healthcare community today to incorporate quality guidelines into clinical workflow. To support and coordinate these efforts, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) have joined together to sponsor and launch the IHE Quality domain. Its mission is to address the infrastructure necessary to share information relevant to quality improvement in electronic patient care and health care records. 
; H : Essential Now
 
; M : Essential Future
 
; L : Nice to Have
 
'''Prerequisites:''' List of applicable standards
Priority:
'''H''' : Essential Now,
'''M''' : Essential Future,
'''L''' : Nice to Have


'''Coordination:''' Other domains to coordinate efforts with.
|'''Strategy:'''
; CP : Develop Content Profile
; IP : Develop Integration Profile
; Res : Research Applicable Standards
; Promote : Promote Applicable Standards Development Efforts
'''Year:''' Earliest Opportunity given prerequisites, priority and skills.
|}
==Roadmap==
==Roadmap==
{| style="width:100%;border:1px solid black;" cellpadding="3" border=1 cellspacing=0
{| style="width:100%;border:1px solid black;" cellpadding="3" border=1 cellspacing=0
Line 21: Line 16:
|-
|-
|Peer Review
|Peer Review
|
 
Peer review and feedback
| 
|ACR RadPeer program
|ACR RadPeer program


Peer review and feedback
AMA/ABMS program using performance measures for peer review of physician hospital groups
|
| 
|
| 
|
| 
|-
|-
|Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals
|Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals
|
| 
|Massachusetts program
|Massachusetts program based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)


Based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)
Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)


Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)
AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness


AQA development of appropriateness metrics for imaging efficiency and cost effectiveness
ACC/AHA Appropriateness Criteria, decision support tools
|
| 
|
| 
|
| 
|-
|-
|Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies
|Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies
|
| 
|
|NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ.
|
| 
|
| 
| 
|-
|-
|Radiation dose
|Radiation dose
|
 
|
*Appropriate aggregation of dose information
|
 
|
*Minimization of dose to target patient population
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|-
|-
|Real-time documentation of continuing education and accreditation (point-of-care CME)
|Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME)
|
| 
|
|ACCME standards for award of physician CME
|
 
|
ABMS MOC requirements
 
Medbiquitous/SCORM
| 
| 
| 
|-
|Patient assessment to prevent adverse events
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|-
|-
|Adverse event reporting
|Adverse event reporting
|
|Measure Reporting


Core Measure Reporting


Patient assessment to prevent adverse events (ACR creating workgroup to develop measures for PQRI program)
| 
|
|Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events
|
 
|
Joint commission requirements (per state)
 
CDC has voluntary and mandatory reporting for some diseases
 
Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS, Joint Commission Adverse Event Reporting
 
Structural measures  
| 
| 
| 
|-
|-
|Data registries
|Measure Reporting
|
|Procedure-specific datasets


Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, etc.) from various care settings
*Institutional (process)


Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
*Physician (performance)


Protocols in place and physician use of protocols
*Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?)
|
| 
|
|AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)
|
|-
|Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data


|
Measures developers (eg, AMA/PCPI, NCQA, ACC/AHA, JCAHO), endorsers, testers and implementers (eg, NQF, AQA)
|
|
|
|
|-
|Harmonization with other initiatives


a. Uniformity of measure import and export formats
Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA


b. Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA
Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS


c. Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS
Structural measures


d. Structural measures - different groups, data measures (eg, infection control)
State/provincial/regional quality measures


e. NCVHS hearings in July
| 
| 
| 
|-
|Data registries


f. State/provincial/regional quality measures
*Procedure-specific datasets (eg, ACC Carotid Artery Stent Registry)
*Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
*Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings
| 
| 
Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA)


g. AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality
Immunization registries


i. Patient identity management/tracking of patients across settings
National Practitioner Database
| 
| 
| 
|-
|Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data
 
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|-
|Consumer aspects of quality reporting
*PHR as record of repeat procedures
 
*Consumer view of provider quality information


h. Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events
*Patient self management


3. Consumer aspects of quality reporting
*Home health monitoring


a. PHR as record of repeat procedures
*Informed patient consent
| 
| 
NQF Consumer Council


b. Consumer view of provider quality information
AARP


c. Patient self management
OASIS Data for Home Care (CMS)


d. Home health monitoring
CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare
| 
| 
| 
|-
|Harmonization with other initiatives


e. Informed patient consent
* NCVHS hearings in July
| 
| 
| 
| 
| 
|-

Latest revision as of 18:49, 6 November 2007

Scope and Current Work

There is ongoing work in several parts of the healthcare community today to incorporate quality guidelines into clinical workflow. To support and coordinate these efforts, the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS), and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) have joined together to sponsor and launch the IHE Quality domain. Its mission is to address the infrastructure necessary to share information relevant to quality improvement in electronic patient care and health care records.


Priority: H : Essential Now, M : Essential Future, L : Nice to Have

Roadmap

Topic Pri Standards/Prerequesites Coord Strategy Year
Peer Review

Peer review and feedback

  ACR RadPeer program

AMA/ABMS program using performance measures for peer review of physician hospital groups

     
Decision support for ordering and procedure approvals   Massachusetts program based on ACR appropriateness criteria (consult with Dr. Keith Dreyer/MGH)

Generate justification data when needed (through use of QED?)

AQA principles for developing measures of appropriateness

ACC/AHA Appropriateness Criteria, decision support tools

     
Retrospective review of outcomes based on utilization of evolving technologies   NOPR (PET registry) ACRIN/CMS/Brown Univ.      
Radiation dose
  • Appropriate aggregation of dose information
  • Minimization of dose to target patient population
         
Real-time documentation of continuing education and certification (point-of-care CME)   ACCME standards for award of physician CME

ABMS MOC requirements

Medbiquitous/SCORM

     
Patient assessment to prevent adverse events          
Adverse event reporting


  Expected AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Adverse Events

Joint commission requirements (per state)

CDC has voluntary and mandatory reporting for some diseases

Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS, Joint Commission Adverse Event Reporting

Structural measures

     
Measure Reporting
  • Institutional (process)
  • Physician (performance)
  • Core Measure Reporting (AHA?/JCAHO?)
  AHIC/ONC/HITSP Use Case on Quality (including patient identity management)

Measures developers (eg, AMA/PCPI, NCQA, ACC/AHA, JCAHO), endorsers, testers and implementers (eg, NQF, AQA)

Measuring health delivery disparities across demographic segments (eg, race, gender, socioeconomic status) - AHA Health Research and Educational Trust, HRSA

Care coordination efforts across disciplines - NQF, CMS

Structural measures

State/provincial/regional quality measures

     
Data registries
  • Procedure-specific datasets (eg, ACC Carotid Artery Stent Registry)
  • Intermediary point to aggregate date to share with CMS, other destination agencies
  • Gathering quality data (peer review, patient safety, protocols in place and physician use of protocols) from various care settings
   

Disease management registries: STS, ACC NCDR, Tumor Registry, Trauma Registry, HDC Registry (HRSA)

Immunization registries

National Practitioner Database

     
Standardized reporting: develop standard formats for reports (eg, Echo, Cath Lab, Nuc Med) to ensure report has elements needed to collect quality data          
Consumer aspects of quality reporting
  • PHR as record of repeat procedures
  • Consumer view of provider quality information
  • Patient self management
  • Home health monitoring
  • Informed patient consent
   

NQF Consumer Council

AARP

OASIS Data for Home Care (CMS)

CMS Hospital Compare and Nursing Home Compare

     
Harmonization with other initiatives
  • NCVHS hearings in July