Rad TF Maintenance 2011-12: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Kevino (talk | contribs)
Created page with "Target: Prepare CP's for Ballot for ?May? 2012 Number of outstanding CPs: :* xx '''Assigned''' CPs to work on ::* For specifics refer to [ftp://iheyr2:interop@ftp.ihe.net/Radiol..."
 
Kevino (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Target: Prepare CP's for Ballot for ?May? 2012
Target: First get TF out with existing FT CPs in February-ish
Prepare new CP's for Ballot for ?May? 2012
 


Number of outstanding CPs:
Number of outstanding CPs:
:* xx '''Assigned''' CPs to work on
:* 20 '''Assigned''' CPs to work on  
::* For specifics refer to [ftp://iheyr2:interop@ftp.ihe.net/Radiology/TF_Maintenance/IHE_Radiology_CP_Tracking-2011-07-25.xls Tracking Doc] and sort by Status
::* For specifics refer to [ftp://iheyr2:interop@ftp.ihe.net/Radiology/TF_Maintenance/IHE_Radiology_CP_Tracking-2011-07-25.xls Tracking Doc] and sort by Status
::* (about 1/2 are stagnant) Should do a review/triage of dormant CPs and cancel or re-start


:* xx '''Completed''' CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked)
:* 0 '''Completed''' CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked)
::* <details>


:* xx '''Submitted''' CPs to review/assign
:* 2 '''Submitted''' CPs to review/assign
::* <details>
::* Update PERF to allow multiple objects per scan
:::* Some extended debate possible on this one.
::* Add Issuer of IDs to MWL




List of "non-trivial" CPs:
List of "non-trivial" CPs:
:* CP-xxx : Title (Author)
:* CP-xxx : Title (Author)
:** <details>
:** no "non-trivial" CPs expected




List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:
:* <details>
:* 1 or 2 minor CPs pending.
:* CP/Discussion - Alignment between SWF 2.5.1 Option and PAM


List of other maintenance tasks:
List of other maintenance tasks:
:* Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
:* Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
:* Adoption of new IHE Templates <add link>
:* Adoption of new IHE Templates <add link>
:* Add 2 FT Supplements to TF (and any made FT next year)
:* R2/RE Harmonization?
:* R2/RE Harmonization?


==7. Risks==
==7. Risks==
Any technical or political risks related to expected maintenance items?
* Risk of effort spent on updating existing Supplements and TF to match new templates being low return-on-investment.
 


==9. Tech Cmte Evaluation==
==9. Tech Cmte Evaluation==


Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):
:* 20%  
:* 10% total for maintenance with new templates only for new supplements
:* 20% if we add adapting current trial implementation supplements to new templates


Responses to Issues:
Responses to Issues:

Latest revision as of 18:02, 8 December 2011

Target: First get TF out with existing FT CPs in February-ish Prepare new CP's for Ballot for ?May? 2012


Number of outstanding CPs:

  • 20 Assigned CPs to work on
  • For specifics refer to Tracking Doc and sort by Status
  • (about 1/2 are stagnant) Should do a review/triage of dormant CPs and cancel or re-start
  • 0 Completed CPs that failed ballot and need to be reworked)
  • 2 Submitted CPs to review/assign
  • Update PERF to allow multiple objects per scan
  • Some extended debate possible on this one.
  • Add Issuer of IDs to MWL


List of "non-trivial" CPs:

  • CP-xxx : Title (Author)
    • no "non-trivial" CPs expected


List of outstanding items not yet submitted as CPs:

  • 1 or 2 minor CPs pending.
  • CP/Discussion - Alignment between SWF 2.5.1 Option and PAM

List of other maintenance tasks:

  • Cleanup of Cross-Referencing to ITI (they renumbered their sections)
  • Adoption of new IHE Templates <add link>
  • Add 2 FT Supplements to TF (and any made FT next year)
  • R2/RE Harmonization?

7. Risks

  • Risk of effort spent on updating existing Supplements and TF to match new templates being low return-on-investment.

9. Tech Cmte Evaluation

Effort Evaluation (as a % of Tech Cmte Bandwidth):

  • 10% total for maintenance with new templates only for new supplements
  • 20% if we add adapting current trial implementation supplements to new templates

Responses to Issues:

See italics in Risk and Open Issue sections

Candidate Editor:

Kevin O'Donnell