PCD ADQ 2011-04-21 Webex: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Khalil M (talk | contribs)
Efurst (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Category:PCD Meeting Archive 2011]]
 
{{TOCright}}
{{TOCright}}


Line 6: Line 7:
== Meeting Purpose ==
== Meeting Purpose ==
5th ADQ meeting (Asynchronous Data Query)
5th ADQ meeting (Asynchronous Data Query)
Refer to [[:Category:PCD ADQ]]


== WebEx Information ==  
== WebEx Information ==  
Line 40: Line 43:
| align="center" | 1
| align="center" | 1
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair  
| '''Introductions & Agenda Review''' <br>- Chair  
| Went over the updated ADQ requirements and the ADQ Topics that are based on them. Everyone was in agreement on the included topics  
| - Went over the updated ADQ requirements and the ADQ Topics that are based on them. Everyone was in agreement on the included topics  
- Use Case section will be Added.  
- Use Case section will be Added.  


Line 48: Line 51:
| '''Item''' <br>- chair
| '''Item''' <br>- chair
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
Parameter set notifications: Do we need active notification of changes in parameter set, or do we keep sending the same fields in the HL7 message with a flag indicating that the parameter is no longer available.
- The Consistent Time / Time Accuracy section was discussed in more details. 3 scenarios were laid out for Medical Devices connected to an ADQ Requestor through and ADQ responder Gateway implementing NTP or SNTP.  


'''Decisions:'''
'''Decisions:'''
It was agreed that it would be easier to keep sending the same data set, but with a flag indicating that a particular obervation became available/not available


'''Actions'''
'''Actions'''
Add Reference to NTP / SNTP implementation document


|-
|-
Line 61: Line 63:


| '''Status/Discussion:'''
| '''Status/Discussion:'''
John R. went over his flow diagrams representing the ADQ requirements. They need to be included in the ADQ formulation document.
 


'''Decisions'''
'''Decisions'''
Line 70: Line 72:


=== Next Meeting ===
=== Next Meeting ===
''[[PCD ADQ 2011-04-21 Webex]]''
''[[PCD ADQ 2011-05-26 Webex]]''




Line 78: Line 80:


[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Patient Care Device | PCD Home]]
[[Category:PCD Meeting]]

Latest revision as of 17:19, 20 July 2012


Patient Care Device Domain

Meeting Purpose

5th ADQ meeting (Asynchronous Data Query)

Refer to Category:PCD ADQ

WebEx Information

Topic: Asynchronous Data Query

Date: Thursday, 21 April 2011

Time: 2:00 pm Eastern

Duration: 60 Minutes

Proposed Agenda

- ADQ Formulation Document |- Accurate Time

Action Items from Previous Meetings

See ADQ Action Items


Participants

Chair: Khalil Maalouf (Nuvon)

John Zaleski (Nuvon), John Rhoads (Philips), Paul Schluter (GE Healthcare), Nishan Wijesinghe (Parigan) , Al Engleburt (),

Discussion

Item Topic Discussion
1 Introductions & Agenda Review
- Chair
- Went over the updated ADQ requirements and the ADQ Topics that are based on them. Everyone was in agreement on the included topics

- Use Case section will be Added.


2 Item
- chair
Status/Discussion:

- The Consistent Time / Time Accuracy section was discussed in more details. 3 scenarios were laid out for Medical Devices connected to an ADQ Requestor through and ADQ responder Gateway implementing NTP or SNTP.

Decisions:

Actions Add Reference to NTP / SNTP implementation document

3 Item
- chair
Status/Discussion:


Decisions

Actions


Next Meeting

PCD ADQ 2011-05-26 Webex



PCD Home