Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* ideally each example should address each of the Process nodes (who/what does it, where, when) even if to say that the node is left out | * ideally each example should address each of the Process nodes (who/what does it, where, when) even if to say that the node is left out | ||
* repeat for a variety of settings | * repeat for a variety of settings | ||
:[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6.1|'''Section 6.1''']] A Radiology Department (i.e. Hospital) | |||
:[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6.2|'''Section 6.2''']] An Imaging Center | |||
:[[Reporting Whitepaper - Section 6.3|'''Section 6.3''']] A Reporting Service (e.g. Nighthawk) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:48, 5 May 2007
Reporting Workflows/Architectures
In this section:
- map out how things are done now (to clarify the currently expected capabilities, to illuminate the gaps, and to understand the baseline for legacy support/transition)
- map out how things “should be done”
- where appropriate, express in terms of existing profiles (See Appendix B)
- ideally each example should address each of the Process nodes (who/what does it, where, when) even if to say that the node is left out
- repeat for a variety of settings
- Section 6.1 A Radiology Department (i.e. Hospital)
- Section 6.2 An Imaging Center
- Section 6.3 A Reporting Service (e.g. Nighthawk)