Talk:Item 10: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Analysis Questionnaire: | Analysis Questionnaire: | ||
1. Do you have any comments on the topic: the results, | 1. Do you have any comments on the topic: the results, work breakdown, etc. | ||
2. What should be the priority of this topic? | 2. What should be the priority of this topic? | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this. | 4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this. | ||
---- | |||
1. No comments | |||
2. Priority 2 | |||
3. Consistency and centralization come to mind. | |||
4. Anibal Jodorcovsky | |||
1. It sounds like a big task with technical challenges. Perhaps it should be scoped to something simpler. | |||
2. Priority 1/2 | |||
3. Consistency is good but need to make sure limited resources to define processes is used for most effect. | |||
4. Karen Witting ITI tech co-chair | |||
Latest revision as of 11:24, 19 December 2006
Analysis Questionnaire:
1. Do you have any comments on the topic: the results, work breakdown, etc.
2. What should be the priority of this topic? Enter a 0, 1, 2 or 3, and 3 is the highest priority.
3. Why do you give this ranking?
4. Enter your name, because we would like to know the preferences of all who care to express this.
1. No comments
2. Priority 2
3. Consistency and centralization come to mind.
4. Anibal Jodorcovsky
1. It sounds like a big task with technical challenges. Perhaps it should be scoped to something simpler. 2. Priority 1/2 3. Consistency is good but need to make sure limited resources to define processes is used for most effect. 4. Karen Witting ITI tech co-chair