Rad Tech Minutes 2008.05.09: Difference between revisions

From IHE Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
==Attendees==
==Attendees==
* Cindy Levy, Merge Cedara (co-chair)
* Cindy Levy, Merge Cedara (co-chair)
* Christoph Dickmann, Siemens
* Dick Donker, Philips
* Dick Donker, Philips
* Rob Horn, Agfa
* Rob Horn, Agfa
Line 10: Line 11:
* Paul Seifert, Agfa
* Paul Seifert, Agfa
* Lynn Felhofer, Tech Proj Mgr
* Lynn Felhofer, Tech Proj Mgr


==Minutes==
==Minutes==
* Reviewed comments on Kevin O'Donnell's draft of profile
* Reviewed comments on Kevin O'Donnell's draft of profile
** Addressed the security aspects of profile including implementation of ATNA; ftp vs DICOM send transactions;
** Addressed the security aspects of profile including implementation of ATNA
** Open Issue: For profiles with security considerations, we should use the process for risk analysis currently being defined by ITI
** FTP-TLS vs DICOM-TLS: DIR must choose one or the other; Registry must support both
*** There will need to be separate ports defined for both (Registry must then have separate ports for FTP and DICOM

Latest revision as of 11:04, 9 May 2008

Topic: Finalize Radiation Exposure Monitoring Profile

Attendees

  • Cindy Levy, Merge Cedara (co-chair)
  • Christoph Dickmann, Siemens
  • Dick Donker, Philips
  • Rob Horn, Agfa
  • Kevin O'Donnell, Toshiba
  • Paul Seifert, Agfa
  • Lynn Felhofer, Tech Proj Mgr

Minutes

  • Reviewed comments on Kevin O'Donnell's draft of profile
    • Addressed the security aspects of profile including implementation of ATNA
    • Open Issue: For profiles with security considerations, we should use the process for risk analysis currently being defined by ITI
    • FTP-TLS vs DICOM-TLS: DIR must choose one or the other; Registry must support both
      • There will need to be separate ports defined for both (Registry must then have separate ports for FTP and DICOM