Talk:1.3.6.1.4.1.19376.1.5.3.1.1.1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Added one minor issue. |
Issue: Schematron rule not valid. |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Fixme | | |||
{{ | We believe there is an issue with the auto-generated schematron rule: | ||
<!-- Verify the document type code --> | |||
<assert test='cda:code[@code = "{{{LOINC}}}"]'> | |||
Error: The document type code of a Medical Documents must be {{{LOINC}}} | |||
</assert> | |||
The rule should either not exist (the CDA4CDT Header rules only require that that the code element exist but do not specify what it shall/should be and there does not appear to be any text in this specification constraining that rule further) or there should be a valid LOINC code in there, not "{{{LOINC}}}". | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 15:27, 19 December 2008
-->>
We believe there is an issue with the auto-generated schematron rule:
<!-- Verify the document type code -->
<assert test='cda:code[@code = "{{{LOINC}}}"]'>
Error: The document type code of a Medical Documents must be {{{LOINC}}}
</assert>
The rule should either not exist (the CDA4CDT Header rules only require that that the code element exist but do not specify what it shall/should be and there does not appear to be any text in this specification constraining that rule further) or there should be a valid LOINC code in there, not "{{{LOINC}}}".
<<--